跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05996315
NCT05996315已完成不适用

Ultrasound Guided Supracondylar Nerve Block & Hematoma Block for Closed Reduction of Distal End Radius Fractures - an Observational Study

Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2022年9月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
40
试验地点
1
主要终点
To compare analgesic effect of supracondylar radial nerve block with hematoma block under ultrasound guidance in closed reduction of distal end radius fractures in emergency department assessed using numerical rating scale.

研究概览

简要总结

Comparison of analgesia between ultrasound guided supracondylar radial nerve block and hematoma block for closed reduction of distal end radius fractures- an observational study

详细描述

A patient who presents to the emergency department with a suspected distal end radius fracture will be assessed with a baseline NRS score1 and given analgesics if needed. Further they will be sent for an x-ray. If the X ray-shows a distal end radius fracture a decision to give hematoma block or supracondylar radial nerve block will be taken as per the choice of the treating physician. Patients who do not meet the exclusion criteria are excluded from the study at this phase. NRS score 2 is assessed once again prior to block and a Hematoma block/ Supracondylar radial nerve block is given. Needle in and out time will be noted and the pain during needling is evaluated using the NRS score 3. Pain score will further be evaluated for every 10 mins after needle out time for a maximum of 30 mins or when the patient gets adequate analgesia ( NRS score 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d).

If the block is successful, the treating physician will proceed to fracture reduction. If the block is a failure the physician will go for a rescue analgesia. NRS score5 will be evaluated at this stage. Further a NRS score 6 will be assessed 15 minutes post reduction. An x-ray will be checked for the evaluation of the reduction procedure performed and the patient will be discharged or admitted as necessary. The patient will be further followed after 1 week for delayed complications.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adults > 18 years with distal end radius fracture requiring closed reduction in Emergency Department
  • Patient who legally consent for study

排除标准

  • History of allergy to local anesthetics
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Infection or burn with local anaesthetic at injection site
  • Patients having other fractures or significant injuries that are causing pain
  • Patients with hemodynamic instability which includes patients with GCS score less than 15 under influence of alcohol/ inebriated state.
  • Patients on anticoagulants
  • Patients with compromised neurovascular system

结局指标

主要结局

To compare analgesic effect of supracondylar radial nerve block with hematoma block under ultrasound guidance in closed reduction of distal end radius fractures in emergency department assessed using numerical rating scale.

时间窗: 60 minute

To assess the difference in analgesic effect of supracondylar radial nerve block with hematoma block under ultrasound guidance in closed reduction of distal end radius fractures in emergency department assessed using numerical rating scale.

次要结局

  • To compare time taken for performing hematoma block & supracondylar radial nerve block(60minute)
  • To compare complication rates of hematoma block & supracondylar radial nerve block for closed reduction of distal end radius fracture(18months)
  • To compare time taken for analgesic effect of hematoma block & supracondylar radial nerve block for closed reduction of distal end radius fracture(60minute)

研究者

发起方
Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Roshan Benny

Junior Resident

Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Ultrasound Guided Supracondylar Nerve Block &... | 临床试验