跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06681233
NCT06681233
招募中
不适用

A Feasibility Study of a Novel Cone-Beam CT Approach for Image Guided Radiotherapy in Cancer Patients

Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company4 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人2025年2月19日

概览

阶段
不适用
干预措施
Comparison of HyperSight CBCT imaging to conventional CBCT imaging.
疾病 / 适应症
Head and Neck Cancers
发起方
Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company
入组人数
50
试验地点
4
主要终点
Comparison of Image Contrast Resolution
状态
招募中
最后更新
上个月

概览

简要总结

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is an imaging technology that is incorporated into many modern radiation therapy systems. The quality of conventional CBCT is good enough to align patients for their daily radiation therapy but CBCT images have poor contrast and are susceptible to imaging artefacts that limit their usability for other tasks in the radiation therapy workflow.

Varian Medical Systems, the sponsor of this study, has developed new CBCT imaging technology called HyperSight that so far has demonstrated increased image quality compared with conventional CBCT images. This new HyperSight CBCT imager has previously been built into Varian Halcyon and Ethos treatment machines, where the imager is enclosed in a ring that rotates around the patient. Now, HyperSight has been built into a Varian treatment machine, called TrueBeam, where the imager is mounted on a C-shaped arm that rotates around you to acquire an image.

This study is being done to evaluate the image quality of HyperSight CBCT compared to conventional CBCT images, and to determine whether HyperSight CBCT can improve the process of delivering radiation treatments.

The goal of this study is to collect images from this new HyperSight-TrueBeam CBCT imager from a variety of patients and locations in the body. The images will be analyzed to determine whether their quality is high enough to use for tasks other than positioning patients for treatment. For example, the study will determine whether the HyperSight images could be used to calculate a radiation plan.

注册库
clinicaltrials.gov
开始日期
2025年2月19日
结束日期
2026年9月1日
最后更新
上个月
研究类型
Interventional
研究设计
Single Group
性别
All

研究者

发起方
Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company
责任方
Sponsor

入排标准

入选标准

  • Patient age ≥ 18
  • Patient is receiving radiation therapy for head and neck, thorax, liver, breast, genitourinary, or gastrointestinal malignancies
  • A CBCT acquisition for localization is standard of care for the radiation therapy treatment plan being delivered

排除标准

  • Patient has ECOG Performance Status ≥
  • Patient is wheelchair bound.
  • Patient has a life expectancy \<3 months.
  • Patient is unwilling or unable to provide informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Patient is pregnant or has plans for pregnancy during the period of treatment.
  • Patient is part of a vulnerable population (per ISO 14155:2020, "individuals who are unable to fully understand all aspects of the investigation that are relevant to the decision to participate, or who could be manipulated or unduly influenced as a result of a compromised position, expectation of benefits or fear of retaliatory response"). This includes prisoners.

研究组 & 干预措施

HyperSight Imaging Arm

干预措施: Comparison of HyperSight CBCT imaging to conventional CBCT imaging.

结局指标

主要结局

Comparison of Image Contrast Resolution

时间窗: End of radiation treatment at 9 weeks.

The difference in contrast resolution will be evaluated between a standard CBCT image, a CBCT image acquired using HyperSight technology, and a standard fan-beam CT acquired as part of the treatment simulation and planning process

Comparison of Image Uniformity

时间窗: End of radiation treatment at 9 weeks.

The difference in image uniformity will be evaluated between a standard CBCT image, a CBCT image acquired using HyperSight technology, and a standard fan-beam CT acquired as part of the treatment simulation and planning process.

Qualitative Image Comparison

时间窗: End of radiation treatment at 9 weeks.

Qualitative comparison of HyperSight CBCT to conventional CBCT to determine preferred imaging for patient localization for daily treatment. Clinician observers will rank their preference using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 represents strong preference of one imaging modality and 5 represents strong preference for the other modality.

次要结局

  • Reduction of Metal Artifacts(End of radiation treatment at 9 weeks.)
  • Imaging Time for Large Treatment Volumes(End of radiation treatment at 9 weeks.)
  • Imaging Time for Breath Hold Imaging(End of radiation treatment at 9 weeks.)
  • Patient Tolerance of Breath Hold Imaging(End of radiation treatment at 9 weeks.)
  • Feasibility of HyperSight CBCT for Treatment Planning(End of radiation treatment at 9 weeks.)

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验