跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04466059
NCT04466059招募中不适用

A Case-Control Study To Determine The Suitability Of Artificial Intelligence For Leukemia Diagnostics

Munich Leukemia Laboratory1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 25,000 人开始时间: 2020年1月5日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
25,000
试验地点
1
主要终点
Sensitivity and Specificity of AI Guided diagnostics in Hematology

研究概览

简要总结

To the best of our knowledge, BELUGA will be the first prospective trial investigating the usefulness of deep learning-based hematologic diagnostic algorithms. Taking advantage of an unprecedented collection of diagnostic samples consisting of flow cytometry datapoints and digitalized blood-smears, categorization of yet undiagnosed patient samples will prospectively be compared to current state-of-the-art diagnosis at the Munich Leukemia Laboratory (hereafter MLL). In total, a collection of 25,000 digitalized blood smears and 25,000 flow cytometry datapoints will be prospectively used to train an AI-based deep neuronal network for correct categorization. Subsequently, the superiority will be challenged for the primary endpoints: sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis, most probable diagnosis, and time to diagnose. The secondary endpoints will compare the consequences regarding further diagnostic work-up and, thus, clinical decision making between routine diagnosis and AI guided diagnostics. BELUGA will set the stage for the introduction of AI-based hematologic diagnostics in a real-world setting.

详细描述

In numerous recent studies, deep neuronal networks (DNN) have been leveraged to examine the usefulness of artificial intelligence (AI)-based DNN for diagnostic purposes. In essence, they have successfully proved to recapitulate state-of-the-art diagnoses currently performed by humans.

Specifically, the use of artificial intelligence for pattern recognition showed that DNN could categorize complex and composite data points, chiefly images, with high fidelity to a specific pathogenic condition or disease. The majority of these studies are primarily based on extensive training sample collections that were categorized a priori. Subsequently, this "training" provided the necessary input to classify newly delivered specimens into the correct subgroups, frequently even outperforming independent human investigators. So far, these studies have thus provided the rationale for the use of DNN in real-world diagnostics. However, the prerequisite for using DNN in a real-world setting, where specimen sampling and analysis would need to outperform human diagnosis prospectively, would be a blinded and prospective trial. Currently, there is a lack of prospective data, therefore still challenging the notion that DNN can outperform state-of-the-art human-based diagnostic algorithms. Here we want to investigate the validity and usefulness of AI-based diagnostic capabilities prospectively in a real-world setting.

Hematologic diagnostics heavily rely on multiple methodically distinct approaches, of which phenotyping aberrant blood or bone marrow cells from affected patients represents a cornerstone for all subsequent methods, such as chromosomal or molecular genetic analyses. At the MLL, five different diagnostic pillars are required to provide diagnostic evidence for a specific malignant blood disorder faithfully: cytomorphology and immunophenotyping first, guiding more specific methods such as cytogenetics, FISH, and a diversity of molecular genetic assays.

+++ Objectives +++

Phenotyping of blood cells is primarily based on two distinct challenges; (1) the morphological appearance and abundance of specific cell types and (2) the presence of particular lineage markers detected by flow cytometry. These two methods are critical for each subsequent decision-making process and, thus ultimately, the final diagnosis. Simultaneously, these two methods are ideally suited for automated analysis by DNN due to their inherent image-based nature. This has been recently illustrated by a publication by Marr and colleagues (Matek et al., 2019; https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0101-9)

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Patients having been diagnosed with a suspected hematological disorder
  • •The suspected diagnoses constitute a primary diagnosis
  • •Only samples of patients min.18 years of age will be used
  • •Samples must suffice quality attributes which are denoted in "Exclusion Criteria"

排除标准

  • •The sample is not fit for state-of-the-art diagnosis or fails initial quality control. For quality insurance, we will exclude samples in heparin- instead of EDTA. Samples with damage due to atmospheric reasons (freeze-thaw damage or elevated temperature) will be excluded.
  • •Samples with too scarce material jeopardizing routine gold-standard diagnosis will be excluded.
  • •Bone marrow aspirates without sufficient material to assess malignant or healthy hematopoiesis.

结局指标

主要结局

Sensitivity and Specificity of AI Guided diagnostics in Hematology

时间窗: 08-01-2020 until 07-31-2021

As a primary endpoint, we will examine the ability of DNN to classify disorders according to (after initial assessment disease/healthy) to the gold-standard diagnosis. The gold-standard diagnosis is defined as an integrated diagnosis, including cytomorphology, flow cytometry, cytogenetics, FISH, and molecular genetics. DNN will independently provide a bi-directional (probabilistic) diagnosis, with the most probable diagnosis. The primary analysis will include a direct comparison between the human cytomorphological examination and the pattern recognition software. Secondly, this result will be provided to downstream diagnostic departments to assess phenotypic diagnosis's usefulness for genetic characterization. We hypothesize that the turn-around time will be significantly enhanced, further providing quality at sooner timepoint.

次要结局

  • enumerate entity-specific benchmarks (e.g., blast count in leukemia) count)(08-01-2020 until 07-31-2021)
  • comparison of clinical consequences(08-01-2020 until 07-31-2021)
  • turn-around-time(08-01-2020 until 07-31-2021)
  • predictive diagnostic value(08-01-2020 until 07-31-2021)

研究者

发起方
Munich Leukemia Laboratory
申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Torsten Haferlach

Prof. Dr. Dr.

Munich Leukemia Laboratory

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验