The Effect of Different Simulation Applications Used in Breastfeeding Education on Breastfeeding Knowledge, Skills and Clinical Self-Efficacy of Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中(未招募)
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 157
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Breastfeeding Assistance Clinical Readiness Scale
研究概览
简要总结
Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of breastfeeding education using different simulation techniques on nursing students' breastfeeding knowledge, counseling skills, and clinical self-efficacy.
Method: The study sample consisted of 157 nursing students. Data were collected using a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Breastfeeding Assistance Clinical Preparedness Scale, the Breastfeeding Knowledge Form, the Clinical Self-Efficacy in Performance Scale, and the Breastfeeding Counseling Skills Checklist.
Conclusion: We expect that simulation and standardized patient-based breastfeeding education will effectively improve nursing students' readiness for breastfeeding assistance, breastfeeding knowledge, breastfeeding counseling skills, and clinical self-efficacy in breastfeeding performance.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •having taken a gynecology and obstetrics nursing course, volunteering to participate in the research, and not having received formal training on breastfeeding.
排除标准
- •voluntarily withdrawing from the research and not participating in any stages of the research.
结局指标
主要结局
Breastfeeding Assistance Clinical Readiness Scale
时间窗: before training, 1 hour after training, 4 weeks after
In the scale developed by the researchers, students evaluate themselves from 0 (not sure) to 10 (absolutely sure) based on the statement "I am ready to provide breastfeeding counseling and breastfeeding care to a mother who has given birth in the clinic.
Breastfeeding Information Form
时间窗: before training, 1 hour after training, 4 weeks after
The Breastfeeding Information Form was prepared by researchers using the breastfeeding information inventory developed by Marzalik in 2004 and the competency verification toolkit guide published by the World Health Organization to ensure the competency of direct care providers in the implementation of the baby-friendly hospital initiative. The form consists of 25 statements. Participants are asked to answer each statement as true, false, and I don't know. A correct answer in the form is worth 1 point, and the highest score on the form is 25 and the lowest is 0. As the score received from the form increases, it is interpreted as the level of breastfeeding knowledge increases. In order to evaluate the appropriateness of the scope and content of the form, expert opinions will be obtained from at least 9 faculty members.
Self-efficacy scale in clinical performance
时间窗: before training, 1 hour after training, 4 weeks after
In order to determine the self-efficacy perceptions of nursing students about their clinical performance, the Clinical Performance Self-Efficacy Scale (CPSES) was developed by Cheraghi et al. (2009) in 2009. The Turkish validity and reliability studies of the scale were conducted by Zaybak (2016). The scale, which consists of a total of 37 items, consists of 4 factors (sub-dimensions) as "Data collection", "Diagnosis and planning", "Application" and "Evaluation". The scale's total and sub-dimension score averages are evaluated by taking the item score average. A high score average obtained from the scale indicates that self-efficacy in clinical performance is high. The total Cronbach alpha coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.98.
Breastfeeding Counseling Skills List
时间窗: 4 week after training
Created by researchers using professional practice guides. This skill list is used by the student during breastfeeding counseling. Scoring is done based on whether the breastfeeding counseling student demonstrates the skill. There are 25 steps in the skill list. Correct application is evaluated as 2 points, incomplete application as 1 point, and failure to apply as 0 points. The maximum score received from the list is 50 and the minimum score is 0. Expert opinions will be obtained from at least 9 faculty members in order to evaluate the appropriateness of the scope and content of the form
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Sinem Ceylan
RN, PhD, Assistant Prof.
Gulhane School of Medicine
