跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05451225
NCT05451225已完成不适用

Reducing Duration of Untreated Psychosis Through Early Detection in a Large Jail System - Surveys of Correction Officers

Columbia University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 451 人开始时间: 2020年1月8日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
451
试验地点
1
主要终点
Correction Officers' Knowledge at Baseline

研究概览

简要总结

The investigators will implement a multifaceted Target Education Campaign (TEC) within the three jails about recognizing early psychotic symptoms and referring to the Correctional Health Services. This campaign will include print materials and targeted trainings for Correction Officers. To develop all aspects of the TEC, the investigators will convene a workgroup, meeting biweekly for the first 6 months, including the entire investigative team, as well as experts at the Center for Practice Innovations (CPI). Depending on the nature of agreed-upon educational materials, the investigators will use specific areas of expertise at CPI for development. Materials will provide specific, actionable, and persuasive messaging about: (1) how to identify select signs of psychosis, (2) how to refer to the Specialized Early Engagement Support Service (SEESS) (in year 2), and (3) the effectiveness of early treatment through coordinated specialty care for early psychosis. Messaging will be continuous in the three jails.

详细描述

Because Correction Officers in the three jails of interest are critically positioned to influence pathways to care, print materials will be supplemented with professional outreach and education by the SEESS. Roll-call is the approved venue by which all ongoing education happens for Correction Officers. Roll-calls take place at the beginning of each shift (7am, 3pm, 11pm) every day of the week in the same location and last ~ 15 - 20 minutes; all staff starting that shift attend. During roll-call, brief messages (2-3 minutes) will be delivered by the Controlling Captains, which is the standard practice for communicating important information to Correction Officers. Both daytime and overnight shifts will receive the targeted training for the 24 months of the TEC.

The investigators will collect pre-TEC (baseline) and during-TEC (at 6 months and 12 months) data from Correction Officers through brief surveys, which will be used to test changes in mean scores for knowledge, behavioral expectations, and self-efficacy, which are three key constructs from Social Cognitive Theory.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Sequential
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
21 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Correction Officers;
  • •over the age of 21

排除标准

  • •children under the age of 21 years

研究组 & 干预措施

Targeted Educational Campaign (TEC) for Correction Officers

Experimental

The investigators will implement a Targeted Educational Campaign (TEC) within 3 jails. The TEC is designed to lead to referrals of detainees (previously not detected as having potential mental health concerns) to Correctional Health Services (CHS) by Correction Officers.

干预措施: Targeted Educational Campaign (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Correction Officers' Knowledge at Baseline

时间窗: Baseline

Survey-based scores on knowledge/skills at baseline. To measure behavioral capability (knowledge/skills), the investigators used the Correction Officers' Behavioral Capability Scale, which has a minimum value of 0 and maximum value of 10. Higher scores mean better knowledge about psychosis and therefore a better outcome.

Correction Officers' Knowledge at 6 Months

时间窗: 6 months

Survey-based scores on knowledge/skills at 6-months. To measure behavioral capability (knowledge/skills), the investigators used the Correction Officers' Behavioral Capability Scale, which has a minimum value of 0 and maximum value of 10. Higher scores mean better knowledge about psychosis and therefore a better outcome.

Correction Officers' Knowledge at 12 Months

时间窗: 12 months

Survey-based scores on knowledge/skills at 12-months. To measure behavioral capability (knowledge/skills), the investigators used the Correction Officers' Behavioral Capability Scale, which has a minimum value of 0 and maximum value of 10. Higher scores mean better knowledge about psychosis and therefore a better outcome.

Correction Officers' Behavioral Expectations at Baseline

时间窗: Baseline

Survey-based scores on behavioral expectations at baseline. To measure expectation, the investigators used the Correction Officers' Expectations Scale, which has a minimum value of 8 and a maximum value of 32. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Correction Officers' Behavioral Expectations at 6 Months

时间窗: 6 months

Survey-based scores on behavioral expectations at 6-months To measure expectation, the investigators used the Correction Officers' Expectations Scale, which has a minimum value of 8 and a maximum value of 32. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Correction Officers' Behavioral Expectations at 12 Months

时间窗: 12 months

Survey-based scores on behavioral expectations at 12 months. To measure expectation, the investigators used the Correction Officers' Expectations Scale, which has a minimum value of 8 and a maximum value of 32. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Correction Officers' Self-Efficacy at Baseline

时间窗: Baseline

Survey-based scores on self-efficacy at baseline. To measure self-efficacy, the investigators used the Correction Officers' Self-Efficacy Scale, which has a minimum value of 8 and a maximum value of 32. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Correction Officers' Self-Efficacy at 6 Months

时间窗: 6 months

Survey-based scores on self-efficacy at 6-months. To measure self-efficacy, the investigators used the Correction Officers' Self-Efficacy Scale, which has a minimum value of 8 and a maximum value of 32. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Correction Officers' Self-Efficacy at 12 Months

时间窗: 12 months

Survey-based scores on self-efficacy at 12-months. To measure self-efficacy, the investigators used the Correction Officers' Self-Efficacy Scale, which has a minimum value of 8 and a maximum value of 32. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Michael Compton

Professor of Psychiatry

Columbia University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验