跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02943954
NCT02943954Unknown不适用

FLOW Evaluation to Guide Revascularization in Multi-vessel ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,170 人开始时间: 2016年12月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
1,170
试验地点
1
主要终点
Rate of major adverse cardiac events

研究概览

简要总结

Although current guidelines recommend fractional flow reserve (FFR) to identify haemodynamically relevant coronary lesion(s) in stable patients when evidence of ischaemia is not available (Class I, Level of Evidence: A), no published study has assessed the usefulness of FFR to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multi-vessel disease (MVD).

The main objective of this study is to determine whether, in STEMI patients with MVD amenable to PCI, the use of FFR in addition to angiography will improve cardiovascular outcomes, compared with the current practice of angiography- guided PCI, by improving the appropriateness of revascularisations by assessing the relevance of non-culprit lesions in the context of STEMI with multivessel coronary artery disease.

The secondary objective is to assess the safety and the cost-effectiveness of the FFR-guided strategy compared to the angiography-guided strategy.

详细描述

The optimal revascularisation strategy in STEMI patients with MVD is currently debated. Recent data suggest that MV-PCI may be the most appropriate option for treating such patients. Consequently, the real challenge becomes to define what MVD is, in the context of acute MI, in order to limit revascularisation by PCI to vessels that truly need it. Visual estimation of the degree of coronary stenoses is a poor indicator of their haemodynamic severity. FFR is precisely designed and recommended in current guidelines to provide objective guidance for the functional assessment of lesion severity during coronary angiography in stable patients, but it has not been validated in STEMI patients with MVD. The purpose of the present trial will therefore be to investigate the relevance of FFR to guide the revascularisation management of patients at the acute stage of STEMI.

STEMI patients with successful culprit lesion PCI (primary, rescue or pharmaco-invasive) and ≥ 50% diameter stenosis by visual estimate, in which revascularization is contemplated and judged amenable to PCI in at least one additional non-culprit lesion will be randomized into two groups: angiography-guided PCI or FFR-guided PCI.

If the patient is randomized to the angiography-guided PCI, all the lesions indicated beforehand will be treated. If the patient is randomized to the FFR-guided PCI, measurements of FFR of non-infarct related lesion(s) will be performed and only those lesions with a FFR ≤ 0.80 will be treated.

The use of drug-eluting stents is encouraged in both strategies. All patients will receive optimal medical therapy (including dual antiplatelet therapy, beta-blockers, statins, ACE-I or ARB) as recommended in international guidelines in both strategies.

Clinical follow-up will be performed at discharge, 30-day, 6 month and one-year. Rates of major adverse cardiac events, functional class and number of anti-anginal medications used will be collected. If the patient has been rehospitalized since index hospital discharge, the discharge summary and all relevant information will be collected.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •STEMI patients ≥ 18 years old with successful culprit lesion PCI (primary, rescue or pharmaco-invasive) and ≥ 50% stenosis judged amenable to PCI in at least one additional non-culprit lesion
  • •Written informed consent

排除标准

  • •Patients with cardiogenic shock (SBP < 90 mmHg with clinical signs of low output or patients requiring inotropic agents)
  • •Patients with MVD referred to surgery for CABG or treatment of acute complications (e.g. ventricular septal rupture)
  • •Patients with one-vessel disease
  • •Previous coronary bypass surgery
  • •Extremely tortuous, calcified coronary vessels or chronic total occlusion (CTO)
  • •Life expectancy < 2 years
  • •Patients with known hypersensitivity to adenosine
  • •Pregnancy
  • •Participation in another interventional therapeutic study at the same time or within 3 months prior to the beginning of the present study

研究组 & 干预措施

Angiography guided PCI

Other

Revascularisation of non-culprit lesions guided by PCI

干预措施: Angiography guided PCI (Procedure)

FFR guided PCI

Other

Revascularisation of non-culprit lesions guided by FFR measurement

干预措施: Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Rate of major adverse cardiac events

时间窗: 1 year

Number of deaths, myocardial infarctions and unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularizations at one year.

次要结局

  • Rehospitalization for angina during the follow up period(1 year)
  • Procedure time(5 days)
  • Functional class at 1 year(1 year)
  • Health-related quality of life(1 year)
  • Anti-anginal medications used(1 month, 6 months and 1 year)
  • Cost effectiveness(1 year)
  • Cost utility(1 year)
  • Rate of nonculprit artery target lesion treated by urgent revascularization(1 year)
  • Rates of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days and 6 months(30 days and 6 months)
  • Deaths(1 year)
  • Myocardial infarctions(1 year)
  • Repeat revascularizations(1 year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验