Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone Patellar Bone or Quad Tendon Autograft With or Without Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis in Individuals Who Are at High Risk of Graft Failure (STABILITY 2)
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中(未招募)
- 入组人数
- 1,272
- 试验地点
- 31
- 主要终点
- ACL Clinical Failure
研究概览
简要总结
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries in young individuals, particularly those that are active in sports. Up to 30% of individuals under the age of 20 years suffer a re-injury to the reconstructed ACL. Revision ACLR has been associated with degeneration of the articular cartilage and increased rates of meniscal tears, increasing the risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA), additional surgical procedures, reduced physical function and quality of life. As such, strategies to reduce ACLR failure, particularly in young active individuals, are critical to improving short and long-term outcomes after ACL rupture.
There is ongoing debate about the optimal graft choice and reconstructive technique. Three autograft options are commonly used, including the bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB), quadriceps tendon (QT) and hamstring tendon (HT). Additionally, a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) may provide greater stability to the ACLR; however, its effect on failure rate is unclear and surgery-induced lateral compartment OA is a concern.
To definitively inform the choice of autograft and the need for a LET, this multicenter, international randomized clinical trial will randomly assign 1292 young, active patients at high risk of re-injury to undergo ACLR using BPTB or QT autograft with our without LET.
详细描述
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is complicated by high failure rates in young, active individuals, which is associated with worse outcomes and higher rates of osteoarthritis (OA). ACLR failure reduces quality of life (QOL) and has substantial socioeconomic costs. Therefore, strategies to reduce ACLR failure are imperative. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) may provide greater stability; however, its effect on the rate of graft failure remains unclear, and surgically-induced lateral compartment OA is a concern given the potential for over-constraint of the joint.
Many surgeons believe that autograft choice for ACLR, with or without LET, does not affect graft failure. Specifically, bone patella tendon bone (BPTB) autograft has been perceived to be just as good as a hamstring tendon (HT) graft. However, recent meta-analyses suggest that BPTB grafts provide better stability, albeit with greater donor site morbidity. Increasingly, quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft is being used for ACLR with claims of comparable stability to the BPTB graft without the donor site morbidity. However, the effects of a QT on graft failure are unknown. Despite its importance, there has not been an adequately powered study to evaluate if BPTB or QT is superior to the other in terms of graft failure rates, return to sports, donor site morbidity, lateral compartment OA and healthcare costs.
Objectives:
Determine if graft type (QT, BPTB, HT) with or without a LET affects:
- Rate of ACL clinical failure 2 years after ACLR;
- Patient-reported outcomes, muscle function, performance-based measures of function (hop tests, drop vertical jump) and return to sports;
- Intervention-related donor site morbidity, complications and adverse outcomes;
- Cost-effectiveness of ACLR and LET. Approach: This is a multicenter, international, randomized clinical trial that will randomly assign 1292 ACL deficient patients at high risk of re-injury, to an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a BPTB or QT autograft with or without a LET in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Data from this study will be combined with data from a recently completed randomized clinical trial comparing ACLR with a hamstring tendon (HT) graft with or without LET.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
All outcome assessors will be blinded to group allocation.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 14 Years 至 25 Years(Child, Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Age 14-25,
- •An ACL-deficient knee,
- •Skeletal maturity (i.e. closed epiphyseal growth plates on standard knee radiographs),
- •At least two of the following: participate in a competitive pivoting sport; have a pivot shift of grade 2 or greater; have generalized ligamentous laxity (Beighton score of ≥4) and/or genu recurvatum >10 degrees.
排除标准
- •Previous ACLR on either knee,
- •Partial ACL injury (defined as one bundle ACL tear requiring reconstruction/augmentation of the torn bundle with no surgery required for the intact bundle),
- •Multiple ligament injury (two or more ligaments requiring surgery),
- •Symptomatic articular cartilage defect requiring treatment other than debridement,
- •>3 degrees of asymmetric varus,
- •Inflammatory arthropathy,
- •Inability to provide consent,
- •Pregnancy at baseline.
研究组 & 干预措施
BPTB + LET
Patients will undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a bone patellar bone tendon (BPTB) autograft with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET).
干预措施: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) (Procedure)
BPTB + LET
Patients will undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a bone patellar bone tendon (BPTB) autograft with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET).
干预措施: Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) (Procedure)
BPTB alone
Patients will undergo ACLR using a BPTB autograft without LET.
干预措施: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) (Procedure)
QT + LET
Patients will undergo ACLR using a quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft with LET.
干预措施: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) (Procedure)
QT + LET
Patients will undergo ACLR using a quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft with LET.
干预措施: Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) (Procedure)
QT alone
Patients will undergo ACLR using a QT autograft without LET.
干预措施: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
ACL Clinical Failure
时间窗: 24 months
This is a composite endpoint defined as 1) graft rupture or, 2) persistent rotational laxity (asymmetrical positive pivot shift).
次要结局
- Isokinetic Hamstring Strength(6, 12 and 24 months)
- Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)(24 months (at 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months))
- International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF)(24 months (at 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months))
- Marx Activity Rating Scale(24 months (at 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months))
- Isokinetic Quadriceps Strength(6, 12 and 24 months)
- ACL-Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire(24 months (at 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months))
- Side-to-side difference in knee range of motion(24 months (at 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months))
- Isometric Quadriceps Strength(6, 12 and 24 months)
- Drop vertical jump (DVJ) testing(6 and 12 months)
- Isometric Hamstring Strength(6, 12 and 24 months)
- Donor site morbidity - Sensory Disturbance(24 months (at 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months))
- Limb Symmetry Index - Hop test(6, 12 and 24 months)
- Donor site morbidity - Anterior Kneeling Pain(24 months (at 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months))
- Adverse events(24 months (at 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months))
研究者
James J. Irrgang
Professor
University of Pittsburgh
