High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Typical Atrial Flutter
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 120
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Safety primary outcome: incidence of procedure-related complications.
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) dependent flutter ablation is the bidirectional conduction block of CTI. The probability of achieving a permanent bidirectional block at the CTI depends, mainly, on the ablation energy applied and the quality of the obtained lesion. Among the factors that determine the lesion's quality those which have the bigger impact are catheter stability, contact force, power and duration of energy application and the temperature reached at depth.This is a multicenter 1:1 randomized, blinded (open for the operator) study. Two CTI ablation strategies are compared: 1) conventional treatment branch which consists of individual 25-40 W applications of unlimited duration until achieving in each application the minimum value of one of the currently accepted and used lesion markers (Ablation Index >500 at the anterior half of the CTI and >400 at the posterior half with de CARTO 3 system; 2) experimental treatment branch consistent of CTI block using individual high power (90W) short duration (4 seconds) point-by-point applications. The main objective of this study is assessing the non-inferiority of the efficacy and safety of high-power short-duration ablation in patients undergoing typical atrial flutter ablation. Secondary objectives include the comparison of total radiofrequency time, number of applications, number of steam pops, percentage of reconnections, procedure duration, pain during the procedure and time to atrial flutter recurrence.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients with cavotricuspid isthmus dependent flutter referred to ablation
- •Patients clinically and hemodynamically stable.
- •Patients who give informed consent.
排除标准
- •Refusal to participate in the register or inability to understand the informed consent.
- •Age under
- •Patients who have already undergone previous flutter ablation procedures.
结局指标
主要结局
Safety primary outcome: incidence of procedure-related complications.
时间窗: One year
Number of procedure-related complications from the time of the ablation until the last follow-up visit.
Efficacy primary outcome: typical atrial flutter recurrence.
时间窗: One year
Incidence of typical atrial flutter recurrence during a one-year follow-up period. To be considered clinically relevant the recurrence must be documented by a full EKG made because of patients' symptoms or any typical atrial flutter detected by an EKG, 24h Holter-EKG or events-monitoring device that will be performed at least at a 6 months and 12 months follow-up visits.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Jose Luis Ibañez Criado
Medical Doctor
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
