跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01801059
NCT01801059已完成不适用

Patient Activation To Increase Colon Cancer Screening (THE CHAT STUDY)

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 284 人开始时间: 2007年9月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
284
试验地点
1
主要终点
Completion rate of CRC screening

研究概览

简要总结

This randomized clinical trial focused on activating the patient to ask their health care provider for a colorectal cancer screening test to improve screening rates for colorectal cancer. The patient activation intervention may increase information seeking, number of screening tests ordered and number of completed screening tests for colorectal cancer.

详细描述

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To test a patient activation intervention to improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates using fecal occult blood test (FOBT) among male and female patients 50 years and older from the East Central Columbus Neighborhood Health Center.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess if there is a change in knowledge and attitudes about CRC screening after watching the educational video.

II. To assess the effectiveness of providing communication skills training for improving discussion focusing on CRC screening during the patient-provider visit.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Screening
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
50 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Patient is 50+ years of age
  • •Patient is in need of CRC screening
  • •Patient is in good health (e.g. no contraindications to having CRC screening, such as a history of colorectal cancer, congenital heart failure, renal failure, dialysis, dementia, severe arthritis, etc.)
  • •Patient is not pregnant
  • •Patient is able to speak, read, and understand English

排除标准

  • •Patient is within CRC screening guidelines
  • •Patient is at high risk for CRC
  • •Patient cannot understand English
  • •Patient cannot complete a CRC screening test

研究组 & 干预措施

Arm I education CRC and CRC screening

Active Comparator

Educational intervention: Patients receive CRC and CRC screening information from an educational video and received a brochure focused on healthy hints to prevent CRC. Questionnaire administration prior to and after the intervention.

干预措施: educational intervention (Other)

Arm I education CRC and CRC screening

Active Comparator

Educational intervention: Patients receive CRC and CRC screening information from an educational video and received a brochure focused on healthy hints to prevent CRC. Questionnaire administration prior to and after the intervention.

干预措施: questionnaire administration (Other)

Arm II education and patient activation intervention

Experimental

Educational intervention administered: Patients receive patient activation intervention comprising CRC and CRC screening information and communication skills training intervention by educational video and brochure, and they also receive a brochure focused on healthy hints to prevent CRC. Questionnaire administration prior to and after the intervention.

干预措施: educational intervention (Other)

Arm II education and patient activation intervention

Experimental

Educational intervention administered: Patients receive patient activation intervention comprising CRC and CRC screening information and communication skills training intervention by educational video and brochure, and they also receive a brochure focused on healthy hints to prevent CRC. Questionnaire administration prior to and after the intervention.

干预措施: questionnaire administration (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Completion rate of CRC screening

时间窗: Up to 2 months

A test of two proportions will be used. If the two groups are different at baseline with respect to key covariates, then a logistic regression model will be used to assess the effect of the intervention on CRC screening controlling for possible confounding variables. The variables that differ between the two groups will be tested as confounders using risk-factor modeling. Summary statistics will be used to describe the time point that subjects receive CRC screening, either after the medical visit or after telephone barriers counseling, and relevant comparisons made.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mira Katz

Principal Investigator

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验