跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04458090
NCT04458090已完成不适用

Underutilization of Hospice in Older African Americans

University of Colorado, Denver2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 144 人开始时间: 2019年3月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
144
试验地点
2
主要终点
Decision Self Efficacy Scale

研究概览

简要总结

Despite the documented benefits of hospice, less than 2 million people utilize hospice services annually. Underuse disparities are extreme across race and ethnicity as White Americans comprise 85% of all hospice enrollees. AAs account for only 8% of hospice enrollees but are more likely to die from the top three hospice diagnoses (i.e. cancer, heart disease and dementia) than White Americans. Even when AAs enroll in hospice, they spend less time in hospice than White patients, averaging fewer than seven days in hospice care. Notably, AA hospice enrollees report a higher degree of satisfaction with end of life care when hospice is involved, as compared to AAs who are not enrolled in hospice care. There are several potential barriers that may prevent AAs from enrolling in hospice care including lack of knowledge of hospice care, mistrust in healthcare, perceived discrimination, health literacy. AAs routinely report less knowledge of hospice than White Americans, and the information that AA know about hospice often comes from non-medical professionals and is inaccurate. Some AA have persistent mistrust in healthcare due to events such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments and many AA perceive discrimination when accessing healthcare. Data shows that health literacy is a stronger predictor of hospice use than race and older AAs are more likely to possess low health literacy. The driving hypothesis of this research is that by providing clear and accurate information to older AAs will help address the underutilization of hospice by clarifying misperceptions, building trust, and overcoming literacy barriers. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are an evidence-based approach to improve patient agency in medical decision making. Research shows that AA report a desire for more agency and autonomy in decision-making yet the use of PtDAs is understudied in AA communities. This proposal offers a unique opportunity to address many of the potential barriers that may prevent older AAs from enrolling in hospice, while simultaneously expanding the literature of SDM specific to older AAs. The goals of this proposal are to evaluate if the relationships between health literacy and hospice knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs is mediated by mistrust in healthcare and perceived discrimination among AAs aged 65 or older (Aim1) and to evaluate the effect of the hospice PtDA on changing hospice knowledge and attitudes and beliefs about hospice in AA aged 65 and older (Aim 2).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
65 Years 至 —(Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Self identify as Black or African American
  • At least 65 years of age

排除标准

  • Non-English speakers.
  • Patients with cognitive Impairments preventing ability to provide informed consent.

研究组 & 干预措施

Intervention

Experimental

Receive hospice patient decision aid

干预措施: A decision aid for patients considering Hospice care. (Behavioral)

Control

No Intervention

Does not receive hospice decision aid

结局指标

主要结局

Decision Self Efficacy Scale

时间窗: 1 month

Decision Self-Efficacy Scale is an 11-item 5-point Likert scale (ranging from not at all confident to very confident). Maximum score is 100 and minimum score is 0. Higher scores indicate more self-efficacy.

Hospice Knowledge Scale

时间窗: 1 month

Hospice Knowledge Scale is a 23-item true/false scale. Each question is worth 1 point with 23 being the highest score. Possible scores range from 0 to 23, with higher scores indicate more hospice knowledge.

Hospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale

时间窗: 1 month

Hospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale is an 8-item 5-point Likert scale (ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree). Each question is scored based on 5 point scale. Maximum score 40 and minimum score 8. Higher scores indicate more favorable opinions of hospice.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验