Comparison of Screening for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) in a Low Prevalence Setting Using Serial Antigen Testing Versus Serial Molecular (PCR) Testing
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 终止
- 入组人数
- 93
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Specificity of CoV-SCAN daily testing regimen
研究概览
简要总结
This study aims to assess how an at-home COVID-19 frequent testing regimen using the CoV-SCAN test kit and a paired phone application to help interpret the test result compares to once-a-week or three-times-a-week polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (molecular) testing to identify a SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Employees and cast members at Media and Entertainment Company and its affiliates will be recruited to test whether frequent use of CoV-SCAN will perform as well or better than weekly molecular testing and at least as well as three-times-a-week molecular testing.
详细描述
Antigen tests are simple to perform, have a rapid turn-around time of 15-30 minutes, and a lower cost than molecular tests. Because antigen tests do not incorporate an amplification step, they are intrinsically less sensitive than PCR molecular tests. Nevertheless, several investigators have examined the feasibility of screening populations of individuals in a low SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence situation, such as the workplace or schools, with rapid antigen tests in place of the molecular tests. Using viral kinetics, knowledge of what level of viral load is required for transmission of culture-competent virus, test sensitivity and modeling, they have come to the conclusion that more frequent testing with a test with lower sensitivity that has a quick turn-around time is better than a test with high sensitivity with a longer turn-around time. Therefore, the goal of this study is to test the hypothesis that frequent testing with a relatively sensitive lateral flow antigen test performed at home using self-collected anterior nasal swabs will be superior to once a week or less PCR testing and non-inferior to three times a week PCR testing in an employment screening setting with a relatively low incidence of new SARS-CoV-2 infections. This study aims to assess how an at-home COVID-19 frequent testing regimen using a Rapid Antigen Screening Test (RAST) and a phone application to help interpret the test result compares to once-a-week or three-times-a-week PCR (molecular) testing to identify a SARS-CoV-2 infection. We expect to recruit up to 4,400 employees and cast members of Media and Entertainment Company and its affiliates to test whether frequent use of the RAST will perform as well or better than weekly molecular testing and at least as well as three-times-a-week molecular testing. Recruitment and the study will continue until at least 31 or at most 148 true positive SARS-CoV-2 molecular results are reached.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Ecologic Or Community
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Aged 18 years or older;
- •Have a smartphone;
- •Understand and read English;
- •Will be on one production location for at least three weeks following enrollment to the study;
- •Will be willing to be contacted by the Study Coordinator after leaving one production location to facilitate continued access to weekly molecular testing;
排除标准
- •Have received any dose of COVID-19 vaccination;
- •Have been diagnosed with COVID-19 infection.
结局指标
主要结局
Specificity of CoV-SCAN daily testing regimen
时间窗: Baseline to 21 days
To compare the specificity (the ability of the test to correctly identify those without the disease) of the rapid antigen testing regimen to the gold standard PCR testing regimen
Sensitivity of CoV-SCAN daily testing regimen
时间窗: Baseline to 21 days
To compare the sensitivity (the percentage of people with the disease who test positive) of the rapid antigen testing regimen to the gold standard PCR testing regimen
次要结局
- Time from CoV-SCAN positive to PCR positive result(Baseline to 21 days)