跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05220345
NCT05220345已完成不适用

Synergistic Effect of G-Eye Balloon for Behind the Folds Visualization With Artificial Intelligence Assisted Polyp Detection (Discovery System) on Adenoma Detection Rate. 'Discovery III Study'

Radboud University Medical Center2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 196 人开始时间: 2022年5月12日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
196
试验地点
2
主要终点
Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR)

研究概览

简要总结

Colonoscopy is the gold standard for colorectal screening. The diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopy highly depends on the quality of inspection of the colon during the procedure. To increase detection new polyp detection systems based on artificial intelligence (AI) have been developed. However, these systems still depend on the ability of the endoscopist to adequately visualize the complete colonic mucosa, especially to detect smaller and more subtle lesions, or lesions hidden behind folds in the colon. With this study we want to combine a device to flatten the folds in the colon combined with an artificial intelligence system to further improve the detection rate of lesions during colonoscopy.

详细描述

Rationale: Colonoscopy is the gold standard for CRC screening. The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is the most important quality parameter for colonoscopy, because of its inverse association with the risk of interval CRC. Yet, the adenoma miss rate (AMR) in conventional colonoscopy is reported in meta-analyses to vary between 22-26%. The diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopy highly depends on the quality of inspection of the colonic mucosa during the procedure. To increase the adenoma detection rate (ADR), new polyp/adenoma detection systems based on artificial intelligence (AI) have been developed, i.e., computer assisted detection (CADe). However, these systems still depend on the ability of the endoscopist to adequately visualize the complete colonic mucosa, especially to detect smaller and more subtle lesions. Therefore, we hypothesize that ADR can further be improved by combining a CADe system, the Discovery system, with a behind the fold (BTF) visualization technique, the G-Eye.

Study design: International multicenter prospective interventional cohort, compared with a cohort from the Discovery II study (NL73127.091.20, trial code NL9135). All subjects will be undergoing colonoscopy with a combined BFT and CADe assisted approach. Outcomes will be corrected for confounders using regression modeling.

Study population: 194 Adult patients (>18 years) from 3 hospitals, scheduled for diagnostic, screening (non-iFOBT based), or surveillance colonoscopy. Exclusion criteria: inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), known polyp or tumor upon referral, therapeutic procedure (e.g. endoscopic mucosal resection), prior surgical resection of any portion of the colon, American Society of Anesthesiologists score of ≥3, Inadequately corrected anticoagulation disorders or anticoagulation medication use, inability to provide informed consent.

Main study endpoints: The primary objective of the present study is to compare ADR between CADe assisted and a combined BTF/CADe assisted colonoscopy. Secondary objectives include advanced neoplasia rate (including advanced adenomas and/or CRC), polyp detection rate, size and histopathology, mean number of polyps per patient, procedure times, bowel cleaning levels, adverse events, inter-operator variability.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Eligible patients who are scheduled for surveillance colonoscopy will undergo one BFT and CADe assisted colonoscopy. There will be no burden for participants regarding the colonoscopy procedure. Colonoscopy is a commonly performed procedure, and the overall serious adverse event rate is low with an estimated risk 2.8 per 1000 colonoscopies. The risk of experiencing a (serious) adverse event with G-Eye and Discovery guided colonoscopy is believed to be equivalent to conventional colonoscopy. The benefit for patients is a higher likelihood of lesion detection during colonoscopy.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adult patients (>18 years)
  • Referred and scheduled for diagnostic, screening (non-iFOBT based), or surveillance colonoscopy.

排除标准

  • Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
  • Known polyp or tumor upon referral
  • Therapeutic procedure (e.g., endoscopic mucosal resection)
  • Prior surgical resection of any portion of the colon
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists score of ≥3
  • Inadequately corrected anticoagulation disorder or anticoagulation medication use
  • inability to provide informed consent.

结局指标

主要结局

Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR)

时间窗: 30 days after procedure

Calculated as the number of patients in whom at least one adenoma is detected during the colonoscopy procedure, divided by the total number of patients that underwent the colonoscopy procedure.

次要结局

  • Polyp Detection Rate(30 days after procedure)
  • Advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR).(30 days after procedure)
  • Sessile detection Rate(30 days after procedure)
  • Location of the lesion: cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid, rectum;(During procedure)
  • Morphological characteristics of the lesion using the Paris classification (Ip, Is, IIa, IIb, IIc, III)(During procedure)
  • Bowel cleansing(During procedure)
  • Mean number of polyps detected per patient(30 days after procedure)
  • Size of the lesion subdivided in categories 0-5 mm, 6-10 mm, 10-20 mm, >20 mm(During procedure)
  • Indication specific ADR,(30 days after procedure)
  • Number of sessile serrated lesions(30 days after procedure)
  • Number of advanced adenomas (adenomas ≥ 10 mm and/or with a villous component and/or with HGD(30 days after procedure)
  • Histopathological characteristics of the lesion according to the Vienna classification(30 days after procedure)
  • Severe) adverse events (S)AEs up to 30 days post-procedure(30 days after procedure)
  • Gloucester Comfort Scale score and analgesia use(During procedure)
  • Mean number of adenomas detected per patient(30 days after procedure)
  • Procedure times with both techniques (i.e., total procedure time, mean polypectomy time and withdrawal time)(During procedure)
  • Post-colonoscopy surveillance intervals when applying European and US surveillance guidelines(30 days after procedure)
  • ADR of the first 20% of patients that have undergone colonoscopy by each endoscopist will be compared with the final 20% of patients in each arm to identify any changes in ADR throughout the trial(At end of study)
  • Cecal intubation rate (CIR)(During procedure)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验