跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00526500
NCT00526500Unknown1 期

Effect of Proprioceptive Stimulation With Passive Gait Training on the Cortical Activity in Patients With Impaired Consciousness Due to Severe Brain Injury.

University of Aarhus1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2006年8月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
1 期
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
EEG:frequency ratios: Alpha versus delta; alpha and beta versus delta and theta; ERP: latency of P300-component.

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of this study is to determine effect of proprioceptive stimulation with passive gait training on the cortical activity in patients with severe brain injury, demonstrated as changes in EEG (electroencephalogram)and ERP (Event Related Potentials).

Hypotheses: 1) Proprioceptive stimulation increases EEG-frequency in patients with impaired consciousness due to severe brain injury.

  1. Proprioceptive stimulation increases conductivity speed of the cognitive P300-component of ERP in patients with impaired consciousness due to severe brain injury.

详细描述

Design: Prospective controlled non-randomized study. Materials and methods: 45 patients with severe brain injury and 15 healthy volunteers will be included in this study.

The study design is illustrated below:

  1. Baseline measurement of electroencephalography (EEG) and event related potentials (ERP)
  2. Gait training in the tilt table with integrated stepping system(20 min).
  3. Control measurement of EEG and ERP Effect parameters: se outcome measures. Statistical evaluation: All collected data will be tested with reference to normal distribution. If the data is not distributed normally, then we will use either a logarithmic transformation before we use parametric statistics, or we will use non-parametric statistics for further calculations.

Further analysis of the data will be done with the help of variance analysis with an inter-individually factor as a group (patients vs control persons) and intra-individually factors as: 1) experimental condition (before vs after training), 2) topographic distribution (anterior vs central vs posterior).

Significance level is set to 0.05 for all effect parameters.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Patient Goup:
  • •Severe Brain Injury
  • •Ongoing Impaired State of Consciousness (RLAS<4)
  • •Stable Vital Functions
  • •Written Consent from Relatives/Legal Guardian
  • •Control Group:
  • •No History of Neurological Diseases in the Past
  • •Age over 18 years
  • •Written Consent -

排除标准

  • •Patient and Control Goup:
  • •Age older than 80 years
  • •Other Neurological Diseases
  • •Lack of BAEP
  • •Severe Co-morbidity
  • •Tilt table contraindications: orthostatic circulatory problems, unstable fractures, severe osteoporosis, sken problems, joint problems, severe asymmetry (major difference in leg length over 2 cm), co-operation problems (psychotic illnesses or neurotic disturbances), adjustment problems (i.e. integrated stepping system cannot be safely adjusted to the patient)

研究组 & 干预措施

P-T

Experimental

干预措施: Tilt Table With Integrated Stepping System (Behavioral)

P- SAH

Experimental

干预措施: Tilt Table With Integrated Stepping System (Behavioral)

P- A

Experimental

干预措施: Tilt Table With Integrated Stepping System (Behavioral)

Control

Experimental

干预措施: Tilt Table With Integrated Stepping System (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

EEG:frequency ratios: Alpha versus delta; alpha and beta versus delta and theta; ERP: latency of P300-component.

时间窗: immediately after the end og the training

次要结局

  • EEG: absolute and relative power in every frequency band; median frequency;(immediately after the end of the training)

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验