ID-ClimAct. Influence of Social Motives of Clients and Staff on the Social Climate of Secure Settings
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 453
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Social Climate Perception
研究概览
简要总结
The social climate in secure settings is an essential element to successful rehabilitation. Previous studies indicate that staff characteristics are a relevant factor contributing to a beneficial social climate. Yet, secure settings form a specific and challenging work environment. Staff members are faced with clients who present a variety of difficult emotional and behavioural problems. Social motives for caring and cooperation can be blocked in a threatening environment, favouring dysfunctional interpersonal dynamics between individuals. This observational study explores the reciprocal influences of social motives between clients and staff on the social climate within secure settings.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Case Control
- 时间视角
- Cross Sectional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Clients who are currently incarcerated within the specified secure settings.
- •Staff members currently employed in the specified secure settings.
- •Individuals (both clients and staff) who are capable of providing informed consent.
- •Clients who are deemed competent and not under any disciplinary restrictions that would preclude participation.
- •Staff members who are directly involved with client care and management.
排除标准
- •Clients who are not considered competent to provide informed consent.
- •Staff members who do not have direct interactions with clients (e.g., administrative staff not involved in direct care).
- •Clients and staff from open prisons
结局指标
主要结局
Social Climate Perception
时间窗: Day 1
Measured through Essen Climate Evaluation Schema (EssenCES). The EssenCES uses a 5-point Likert scale for each item, ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always). The three subscales Therapeutic Hold, Patients' Cohesion and Experienced Safety each comprises five items, the minimum score for each subscale is 0 and the maximum is 20.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Andrea Canel
Principal Investigator
University Psychiatric Clinics Basel
