跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06814327
NCT06814327进行中(未招募)不适用

Prospective Assessment of Risk Predictions of Organ Failure in the Intensive Care Unit - Comparing Accuracy of Human and AI Risk Predictions

ETH Zurich1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 499 人开始时间: 2024年11月18日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
发起方
入组人数
499
试验地点
1
主要终点
Clinician prediction of circulatory failure within 8 hours compared to published ML models

研究概览

简要总结

During this observational study, the investigators aim to assess the ability of ICU clinicians to predict the risk of impending organ failure and retrospectively compare it to the performance of previously published machine learning models. The central hypothesis of this study is that the treating physician can predict impending organ failure in adult ICU patients with similar accuracy as the best previously publishes machine learning models.

详细描述

In this observational study, clinician's (physicians and nurses) assessment of the estimated imminent organ failure risk in an ICU setting are prospectively collected. Circulatory failure is investigated in the primary objective, and respiratory failure, renal failure, and mortality are investigated in secondary objectives. These assessments investigate the predictive performance and influencing factors for clinician prediction. The assessments will be collected in questionnaires and be performed by the clinicians directly involved in the patient treatment and by clinicians who are not actively responsible for the patient treatment. Furthermore, this study aims to benchmark these risk assessments made by healthcare professionals against retrospectively generated AI risk scores for the same patients and timepoints. The AI risk scores will be calculated retrospectively from a set of models from a systematic search of the current literature. The AI models that will be employed for this analysis will be identified as indicated by a systematic review protocol and must satisfy the following two criteria: they do not require any data beyond what is routinely collected during an ICU stay and may be accessed as open source. Such a comparison is vital for the understanding of the relative accuracy and reliability of AI-based predictions in the context of organ failure risk compared to human performance. The data and findings from this study are anticipated to provide evidence for the clinical utility of AI-based risk scores and pave the way for future research into the optimization of AI systems for healthcare applications.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •patient minimum age of 18 years
  • •emergency admission to the ICU
  • •arterial line in place

排除标准

  • •documented refusal (on the general consent form) to participate to clinical research
  • •patients with neurologic conditions that impair the patient's level of consciousness (including, but not limited to stroke, traumatic brain injury, intracranial hemorrhage, CNS infections; except polytrauma)
  • •patients on mechanical circulatory support systems (IABP, VA-ECMO, Impella, VAD) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) at any time during their ICU stay;
  • •patients receiving end-of-life care or are admitted for the sole purpose of evaluating organ donation

结局指标

主要结局

Clinician prediction of circulatory failure within 8 hours compared to published ML models

时间窗: Assessments are collected within the first 72 hours following admission.

This outcome compares the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (auROC) for two methods of predicting circulatory failure within 8 hours of each assessment time point: (1) ICU clinicians' risk estimates, and (2) previously published machine learning (ML) models applied retrospectively. For each assessment, we compute the auROC separately for clinicians and for the ML model for the same time points and patients. The difference in auROC (clinician minus ML) is the main measure of interest, evaluated under a non-inferiority framework with a margin of 0.025.

次要结局

  • Clinician prediction of respiratory failure within 24 hours compared to published ML models(Assessments are collected within the first 72 hours following admission.)

研究者

发起方
ETH Zurich
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验