跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07763522
NCT07763522Enrolling By Invitation不适用

Validation of a Methodology Using Isometric Dynamometer for Ankle Strength Assessment to Quantify LDH-induced Paresis

Helsinki University Central Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 70 人开始时间: 2026年8月10日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
Enrolling By Invitation
入组人数
70
试验地点
1
主要终点
Criterion validity of the isometric handheld dynamometer

研究概览

简要总结

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common condition that may cause lower limb motor weakness (paresis), particularly affecting ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. Although motor deficits are clinically important and may influence treatment decisions, objective and standardized methods for quantifying the severity of paresis are lacking. Current clinical assessment mainly relies on manual muscle testing, which is subjective and has limited sensitivity, while isokinetic dynamometry, the reference standard for muscle strength assessment, is expensive and impractical for routine clinical use.

This prospective validation study aims to evaluate a clinically feasible isometric ankle strength measurement method based on a handheld dynamometer fixed with an external strap to eliminate examiner-dependent resistance. The study will be conducted in two sequential phases. First, validity and reliability of the method will be established in healthy adult volunteers by comparing measurements with those obtained using an isokinetic dynamometer. Second, the method will be applied in patients with LDH-induced lower limb paresis to determine its performance across a broader range of muscle strength values and its clinical applicability.

Outcome measures include maximal isometric ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion force, time to peak force, manual muscle testing (Medical Research Council scale), patient-reported weakness using a Numeric Rating Scale, Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) scores, and functional ankle strength tests. Validity will be assessed using correlation analyses and Bland-Altman agreement analysis, while intra- and inter-rater reliability will be evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients, coefficient of variation, standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable change.

The study seeks to establish a reliable, valid, and clinically practical method for objective assessment of ankle muscle strength in patients with LDH-induced paresis. Such a method could improve clinical evaluation, enable objective monitoring of recovery, facilitate future clinical research, and support treatment decision-making.

详细描述

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is one of the most common causes of lumbar radiculopathy and may result in lower limb motor weakness due to nerve root compression. While radicular pain often improves with conservative treatment, motor deficits may persist, recover slowly, or require surgical intervention. Despite the clinical importance of paresis, objective quantification of muscle weakness remains challenging because no standardized, practical, and validated measurement method is routinely available for clinical use.

Current clinical assessment primarily relies on manual muscle testing (MMT), which uses an ordinal grading system and is inherently subjective. MMT is limited by examiner experience, strength, and the inability to detect small but clinically meaningful changes in muscle function. Isokinetic dynamometry is widely regarded as the reference standard for objective muscle strength assessment because of its high accuracy and reproducibility. However, the equipment is expensive, non-portable, requires specialized training, and is therefore unsuitable for routine outpatient assessment or repeated follow-up measurements.

This study aims to validate a portable isometric ankle strength measurement method using a handheld dynamometer secured with an external fixation strap, minimizing examiner-related variability. The ultimate goal is to develop a clinically feasible method capable of objectively quantifying ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion strength in patients with LDH-induced paresis.

The study is designed as a prospective observational validation study conducted at Helsinki University Hospital. It consists of two consecutive phases.

During the first phase, healthy adult volunteers will undergo repeated ankle strength measurements using both the investigational handheld dynamometer method and an isokinetic dynamometer. This phase will establish criterion validity by comparing the handheld measurements with the reference standard. In addition, intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the handheld method will be assessed through repeated measurements performed by different examiners.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • First phase
  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • Aged 18-65 years old
  • No pathology affecting ankle dorsiflexion or plantarflexion strength

排除标准

  • - Pathology affecting ankle dorsiflexion or plantarflexion strength
  • Second phase
  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • Aged 18-65 years old
  • LDH-induced muscle weakness of ankle dorsiflexion or plantarflexion
  • Exclusion Criteria:
  • - No muscle weakness induced by herniated lumbar disc

研究组 & 干预措施

Study participant

Other

Person participating in validity and reliability assessment

干预措施: Strength test validity and reliability (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Criterion validity of the isometric handheld dynamometer

时间窗: At baseline (first measurement session; Day 0)

Agreement between the investigational isometric handheld dynamometer (HHD) measurement method and the reference standard isokinetic dynamometer (IKD) for maximal ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion strength.

Construct validity of the handheld dynamometer

时间窗: At baseline (first measurement session; Day 0)

Correlation of HHD measurements with patient-reported weakness (Numerical Rating Scale), Lower Extremity Functionality Scale questionnaire, manual muscle testing (Medical Research Council grade) and functional ankle performance tests.

Intra-rater reliability of the handheld dynamometer

时间窗: At baseline (Day 0) and at the second measurement session, within 7 days after baseline

Test-retest reliability of ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion strength measurements obtained by the same examiner.

Inter-rater reliability of the handheld dynamometer

时间窗: At the second measurement session, within 7 days after baseline

Agreement between measurements performed by different examiners

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Teppo Jarvinen

Professor

Helsinki University Central Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Validation of a Methodology Using Isometric... | 临床试验