The Role of Anchoring and Distraction in the Effectiveness of Mindfulness on Reducing Emotional Reactivity
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 42
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Brain activation during the emotion care/regulation task
研究概览
简要总结
The current study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the 8-week Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Life (MBCT-L) on the use of anchoring and distraction as emotion care/regulation strategies. It is hypothesized that anchoring and distraction are related but different processes, which could be evidenced by fMRI. The investigators further hypothesized that mindfulness training could lead to functional changes in the brain, which could also be evidenced by fMRI.
详细描述
To test the hypotheses, the participants will be randomly allocated to either the experimental group or the waitlist control group. Both groups will complete behavioral measures and an fMRI experiment before the experimental group's intervention (T0). The experimental group will receive Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Life (MBCT-L) between T0 and T1, while the waitlist control will receive no treatment during this period. Both groups will complete the behavioral measures and the fMRI experiment again after the experimental group finishes the MBCT-L course (T1).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 25 Years 至 35 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Right-handed
- •Currently registered in post-graduated program with professional counselling training
排除标准
- •History of neurological or other disorders affecting the brain (such as encephalitis, epilepsy, birth defects, or polio)
- •Have experienced a concussion, head or brain trauma, seizures, loss of consciousness
- •Have been injured in the eye by a metallic foreign body.
- •Have been injured by metallic foreign body (e.g. bullet, shrapnel)
- •History of sickle cell anemia/kidney disease/diabetes, asthma, or allergies
- •Long-term use of medication is required
- •Currently pregnant or breast feeding.
- •Had the following conditions or implants in their body:
- •Surgical clips
- •Cardiac pacemaker
- •Neurostimulator/internal electrodes
- •Insulin pump
- •Internal shunt
- •Metal screen / suture
- •Cochlear implants
- •Hearing aid
- •Eye implants/eyelid springs
- •Orthopaedic devices (e.g. pins, nails, screws)
- •Prosthetic heart valve
- •Breast tissue expander
- •Tattoo or permanent eye-lining
- •Body ring
- •Patch/Blood Glucose Monitor
- •Intrauterine contraceptive device
- •Metal blockage in the blood vessel/metal foreign body in the body
研究组 & 干预措施
intervention group
Participants will receive an 8-week mindfulness-based group intervention, namely Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for Life (MBCT-L).
干预措施: Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for Life (MBCT-L) (Behavioral)
waitlist controlled group
Participants in the wait-list control group will receive the same intervention, two months after the experimental group completed the intervention.
结局指标
主要结局
Brain activation during the emotion care/regulation task
时间窗: Baseline (2 weeks before the intervention), Post-intervention (14-16 weeks after baseline)
BOLD signal contrast when the participants performing an emotion counting Stroop task.
Reaction time during the emotion care/regulation task
时间窗: Baseline (2 weeks before the intervention), Post-intervention (14-16 weeks after baseline)
Reaction time of the correct response in the emotion counting Stroop task.
Use of distraction as a emotion care/regulation strategy
时间窗: Baseline (2 weeks before the intervention), Post-intervention (14-16 weeks after baseline), Follow-up (22-24 weeks after baseline)
The mean scores of five items of the self-developed scale to assess the use of distraction and its connection to attentional deployment with a pilot test. Participants used a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 = never to 5 = always, to rate the five statements. The mean score ranged from 1 to 5. A higher score indicates a greater tendency to employ distraction as an emotion regulation strategy. It's important to note that the score only reflects the habitual usage of this strategy and does not imply a better or worse outcome.
Accuracy during the emotion care/regulation task
时间窗: Baseline (2 weeks before the intervention), Post-intervention (14-16 weeks after baseline)
Accuracy of the emotion counting Stroop task.
Mindfulness
时间窗: Baseline (2 weeks before the intervention), Post-intervention (14-16 weeks after baseline), Follow-up (22-24 weeks after baseline)
The mean score of Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R, Feldman, Hayes, Kumar, Greeson, \& Laurenceau, 2007) is a self-report 5-point Likert scale measuring individual differences in mindfulness that includes 12 items. The mean score ranged from 1 to 5. A higher score means a higher level of mindfulness, i.e. an expected outcome from an effective mindfulness intervention.
Psychological well-being
时间窗: Baseline (2 weeks before the intervention), Post-intervention (14-16 weeks after baseline), Follow-up (22-24 weeks after baseline)
The mean score of Psychological Well-being Scale (PWBS; Ryff et al., 1995) includes 18 items measuring 6 aspects of wellbeing and happiness: autonomy, environmental mastery, personal growth, positive relations with others, purpose in life, and self-acceptance. Participants used a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 = highly disagree to 5 = highly agree, to rate the 18 statements. The mean score ranged from 1 to 5. A higher score means a higher level of psychological well-being, i.e. an expected outcome from an effective mindfulness intervention.
Use of anchoring as a emotion care/regulation strategy
时间窗: Baseline (2 weeks before the intervention), Post-intervention (14-16 weeks after baseline), Follow-up (22-24 weeks after baseline)
The mean score of five items of the self-developed scale to assess the use of anchoring with a pilot test. Participants used a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 = never to 5 = always, to rate the five statements. The mean score ranged from 1 to 5. A higher score indicates a greater tendency to employ distraction as an emotion regulation strategy. It's important to note that the score only reflects the habitual usage of this strategy and does not imply a better or worse outcome.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Professor Lam Shui-fong
Director
The University of Hong Kong