跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06451991
NCT06451991已完成不适用

The Effect of Concept Map Use in Nursing Practice on Clinical Decision Making and Reflective Thinking Levels: A Randomized Controlled Study

Nilgun Sert Bas2 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 66 人开始时间: 2025年3月3日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
66
试验地点
2
主要终点
Clinical Decision Making Scale in Nursing

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to evaluate the effect of data collection and creating a patient care plan using a concept map on the student s clinical decision-making and reflective thinking skills of students taking the surgical diseases nursing course who are in the hospital for clinical practice.

详细描述

With the rapid development and change in technology and modern medicine, expectations, tendencies, personality characteristics and learning styles of individuals change. At the same time, today s modern medical environment requires nurses to have analytical thinking, independent decision-making and application skills in clinical practice. One of the main objectives of nursing education is to provide students with critical thinking and decision-making skills and to reflect what they have learnt in theory to their clinical practice skills. The World Health Organisation also recommends the use of innovative and active learning methods, appropriate teaching materials and learning techniques in nursing education. One of the most important modern teaching methods that will facilitate meaningful learning among students is concept maps developed on the basis of Ausubel s Learning Assimilation Theory. At the same time, clinical decision making and reflective thinking are important elements in nursing practice and undergraduate nursing education. One of the most important goals of nursing education is to provide educational approaches to develop these concepts.

The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

  • Does collecting data from the patient using a concept map instead of a traditional care plan in the clinic affect student s; clinical decision-making level?
  • Does preparing a patient care plan using a concept map instead of a traditional care plan in the clinic affect student s; reflective thinking skill level in the clinic?

Research Process:

  • Both groups will be administered sociodemographic data form, clinical decision-making scale in nursing, reflective thinking determination scale and teaching material evaluation form as face-to-face pre-test before the training.
  • The control group will use the traditional method data collection form and care plan.
  • The experimental group will be given face-to-face training before starting the application. The scope of the training will consist of the definition of concept mapping, the aims and benefits of its use in the nursing education process, the principles of concept mapping, the introduction of the materials to be used in the process of data collection and care plan preparation, concept mapping examples specific to 3 different medical cases to improve nursing student s; understanding and comprehension of concept mapping and to increase their interest in learning techniques.
  • After the training, students will be asked to collect data and make a care plan using a concept map.
  • After data collection, face-to-face sociodemographic data form, clinical decision-making scale in nursing, scale for determining the level of reflective thinking and teaching material evaluation form will be applied as a post-test. Population and sample: G*Power 3.1.9.7 sampling calculation programme was used to calculate the sample size in the study. Considering the mean±standard deviation values of the Clinical Decision Making in Nursing scale, the total sample size was calculated as 56, with a minimum of 28 for each group, with an effect size of 0.79 and a margin of error of ± 0.05 at the 82% confidence interval level. However, the research will be started with 33 participants by taking 20% more than the sample size determined by taking into account the situation of the participants leaving the research during the process.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

盲法说明

Within the scope of the research, students will be divided into control (n=33) and experimental (n=33) groups by simple randomisation method. Since the students and instructors should know and follow the material to be used in the data collection process, blinding was not performed.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • To be taking surgical diseases nursing course
  • To agree to participate in the study

排除标准

  • To have received training on concept mapping before the study
  • Not participating in the training given by the researchers before the study

结局指标

主要结局

Clinical Decision Making Scale in Nursing

时间窗: 3 weeks

The scale consists of 40 items. The scale includes four sub-dimensions (10 items each), namely "investigating options and ideas", "investigating goals and values", "evaluating results" and "investigating knowledge and adopting new knowledge impartially". The scale is 5-point Likert type. The minimum total score of the scale is 40 points and the maximum score is 200 points. Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient is 0.78.

Determination of Reflective Thinking Scale

时间窗: 3 weeks

The scale is 5-point Likert type and consists of 16 items. The scale measures students' reflective thinking skill levels at the end of a lesson in four sub-dimensions, each consisting of four items: habit, comprehension, reflection and critical reflection. The lowest score that can be obtained from each sub-dimension is 4 and the highest score is 20. Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient is 0.77.

次要结局

  • Teaching Material Evaluation Form(3 weeks)

研究者

发起方
Nilgun Sert Bas
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Nilgun Sert Bas

Lecturer

Ankara Medipol University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验