跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01178424
NCT01178424已完成不适用

My Depression Wellness Toolkit Study

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 166 人开始时间: 2010年8月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
166
试验地点
2
主要终点
Rates of relapse/recurrence based on CMS and INS/FO configuration.

研究概览

简要总结

Major depressive disorder (MDD) continues to have a profound impact on individuals, families, and the health care system. Despite marked success in treating active individual episodes of unipolar depression, our understanding of the neural and cognitive mechanisms involved in the return of symptoms remains extremely limited, and few interventions exist that specifically target factors involved in prophylaxis. The research being proposed is among the first that is designed to examine neurocognitive markers for depressive relapse vulnerability and link them directly to clinical prognosis.

Hypothesis 1: Cortical midline structures (CMS) network recruitment will be associated with behavioural and neural indices of a reflexive attentional bias towards dysphoric stimuli in a divided attention task.

Hypothesis 2: Behavioural and neural indices of dysphoric attentional bias following mood challenge will predict depression relapse in prospective 18-month follow up.

Hypothesis 3: Relative to CBT, Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) will normalize CMS and right insular/fronto-opercular cortices (INS-FO) network imbalance.

Hypothesis 4: Relative to CBT, MBCT will normalize to healthy control levels, behavioural and neural indices of dysphoric attentional bias, which will be predictive of reduced relapse risk across a 24 month follow up.

详细描述

Relapse and recurrence following recovery from Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) are common and debilitating outcomes that carry enormous social costs [1-3]. Our CIHR funded program of research has studied the nature of psychological vulnerability in affective disorder. We have recently identified the activation of a depressive cognitive mode triggered by temporary dysphoric states as a reliable risk marker for depressive relapse [4, see attached]. In parallel, functional imaging studies have increased our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying normative affective responses [5] and have begun to examine their dysregulation in affective disorder [6-8]. Our research has identified potential brain biomarkers that predict episode relapse in unipolar depression. However, it remains unknown how these potential biomarkers are related to dysphoria-triggered information processing modes that also predict relapse, and whether these neurocognitive vulnerabilities are amenable to intervention, resulting in more lasting prophylaxis. The present proposal employs a cognitive neuroscience approach to examine whether our previously identified neural markers of depression relapse and prophylaxis are associated with a dysphoric information processing mode. In particular, we will use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and behavioural probes to undertake a finely tuned examination of mood linked biases in attention toward dysphoric stimulus events (i.e., sad faces) to link our previously identified neural markers with a specific information processing mode. Further, our preliminary data presented here demonstrate a correlation between these mood linked neural markers and relapse, but we cannot demonstrate that these markers are causally related to relapse or prophylaxis. To address this, we will examine whether these markers and associated dysphoric attentional biases are 1) modifiable via attentional training designed to overcome reflexive modes of thought and perception and 2) are predictive of relapse status across an 24-month prospective follow up of treated patients. This research will elucidate the neural and information processing correlates that may signal relapse risk in recovered depressed patients. This knowledge will increase our limited understanding of the mechanisms underlying enduring depressive relapse vulnerability as well as assess potentially efficient strategies for relapse prophylaxis.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Women or men 18-65 years of age
  • Meeting criteria for prior depression, currently in recovery or remission, according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th eg; DSM-IV-TR, (American Psychiatric Association, 2000)
  • A baseline score of ≤ 12 on the HRSD (Hamilton, 1960)
  • Internet access
  • English proficiency at or above a grade 8 level

排除标准

  • Schizophrenia or current psychosis
  • Organic mental disorder
  • Pervasive developmental delay (PDD)
  • Current substance dependence
  • Imminent suicide or homicide risk
  • Axis I or II disorder that necessitates primary treatment not provided in the study

结局指标

主要结局

Rates of relapse/recurrence based on CMS and INS/FO configuration.

时间窗: 2 years

Patients who relapse will show Increased neural activation in CMS compared to INS/FO regions compared to non relapsers

次要结局

  • Changes in CMS and INSFO network imbalance following MBCT compared to CBT(2 years)
  • Changes in attentional processing of dysphoric stimuli between the groups(8 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Zindel Segal

Principal Investigator

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验