NL-OMON29392招募中不适用
Rate Control Efficacy in permanent atrial fibrillation, a comparison between lenient verus strict rate control in patients with and without heart failure.
etherlands Heart FoundationInteruniversity Cardioly Institute the NetherlandsAstraZenecaAventis SanofiBiotronikGuidantMedtronicRocheVitatron0 个研究点目标入组 500 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 500
研究概览
简要总结
/A
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •1. Patients with persistent AF < 12 months;
- •2. Age < 80 years;
- •3. Resting heart rate > 80 beats per minute;
- •4. On oral anticoagulation.
排除标准
- •1. Paroxysmal AF;
- •2. Known contraindications for strict or lenient rate control;
- •3. Unstable heart failure;
- •4. Cardiac surgery.
- •5. Any current stroke;
- •6. Foreseen pacemaker or cardiac resynchronization therapy;
- •7. Sick sinus syndrome or AV node conduction disturbances;
- •8. Untreated hyperthyroidism;
- •9. Inability to walk or bike.
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Rate Control Efficacy in permanent atrial fibrillation, a comparison between lenient versus strict rate control in patients with and without heart failureAtrial fibrillationISRCTN36532482niversity Medical Center Groningen (UMCG) (Netherlands)500
已完成
不适用
RAte Control Efficacy in Permanent Atrial FibrillationPersistent Atrial FibrillationNCT00392613University Medical Center Groningen500
已完成
4 期
Rate Control Therapy Evaluation in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation (RATE-AF)Permanent Atrial FibrillationNCT02391337University of Birmingham161
进行中(未招募)
1 期
RATe control in Atrial Fibrillation IIPermanent atrial fibrillationEUCTR2015-001918-98-NOVestre Viken HF240
招募中
不适用
Rate Control Efficacy in Atrial Fibrillation With Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis: Lenient vs Strict Rate Control StrategiesRheumatic Mitral StenosisArrhythmias, CardiacAtrial FibrillationNCT06409533University of Brawijaya100
