Evaluating a Community-Led COVID-19 Testing Intervention to Address Mistrust
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 57
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Openness to COVID-19 testing
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of this study is to assess how community-led group discussions about health-related topics may alter beliefs and intentions regarding healthcare recommendations, such as COVID-19 testing and vaccination.
详细描述
Eligible participants will be randomized to intervention or control group. Intervention group participants will meet virtually with other community member participants in small discussion groups once a week for one hour over the course of 12 weeks. The online discussion groups will be led by peer mentor facilitators and supported by a research team member. Discussion topics will include current events, COVID-19, and other health related topics. Control group participants will not meet in weekly discussion groups. At approximately the 0 month, 3 month, and 6 month time points, all participants will answer online surveys about health related topics. At the 3 month and 6 month time points, all participants will also be asked to self-administer a COVID-19 test that investigators provide. Finally, around the fourth month, intervention group participants will be invited to an online feedback session with the research team about participants' experiences in the study.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •18 years or older
- •Resident of one of the 9 housing authority agencies
- •Willing to participate in Zoom meetings and complete online assessments at baseline, 3-month, and 6-month timepoints
- •Ability to read, speak, and understand English
排除标准
- 未提供
研究组 & 干预措施
Control
non-intervention control (participants complete surveys only)
Intervention
Participants engage in weekly community-led small group discussions about health-related topics and answer surveys at 0, 3, and 6 months time points
干预措施: Community-led discussion (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
Openness to COVID-19 testing
时间窗: 0 months, 3 months, 6 months
The COVID-19 Testing Openness Questionnaire is an 7-item self-report measure designed to assess participants' openness to getting tested for COVID-19. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, from 1 "Strongly Disagree" to 5 "Strongly Agree," with the sum of scores ranging from 7 to 35. Higher scores indicate greater openness to COVID-19 testing.
COVID-19 Testing Efficacy
时间窗: 0 months, 3 months, 6 months
The COVID-19 Testing Efficacy Scale is a 6-item self-report measure that will assess participants' perceived self- and response-efficacy related to COVID-19 testing. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 "Strongly Disagree" to 5 "Strongly Agree," with the sum of scores ranging between 6 and 30. Higher scores indicate greater efficacy.
COVID-19 Trust
时间窗: 0 months, 3 months, 6 months
The COVID-19 Trust Questionnaire is an 18-item self-report measure to assess participants' trust of information provided by various institutions and individuals relating to COVID-19. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with the sum of scores ranging from 18 to 90. Higher scores indicate greater trust.
Qualitative feedback
时间窗: 4 months
Qualitative feedback will be obtained from participants in a group feedback session
次要结局
- COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy(0 months, 3 months, 6 months)
研究者
Kelli J. England
Professor
Old Dominion University