跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06812377
NCT06812377已完成不适用

Comparative Study Between Different Mobilization Techniques for Patients With Chronic Tennis Elbow

Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 45 人开始时间: 2025年8月5日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
45
试验地点
1
主要终点
elbow pain

研究概览

简要总结

Background: Tennis elbow is a common musculoskeletal disorder affecting the functional activities of daily living through common extensor tendinopathy. There is a limited knowledge about neural restriction as a source of movement limitation in patients with tennis other than enriched joint mobilization techniques knowledge.

Objectives: This study will be designed to determine the efficacy of adding different mobilization techniques along with eccentric exercises on elbow pain intensity, functional disability, hand grip strength and pain pressure in patients with chronic tennis elbow.

Methods: Forty five patients with lateral epicondylitis with their ages ranged from 18 and 45 more than six weeks will be randomly assigned into three groups. Group A will receive Maitland joint mobilization techniques. Patients in group B will receive Mulligan mobilization techniques while patient in group C will receive radial nerve mobilization.. Both groups will receive eccentric exercises for wrist extensors . Patients will be treated three session per week for four week and they will be evaluated pre and post treatment for pain severity using by visual analogue scale, level of functionality by DASH questionnaire, hand grip strength by hand held dynamometer and pressure pain threshold(PPT) by pressure algometer.

Results: All the outcome variables will be assessed at baseline and 4weeks following the treatment period.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 50 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •This study will include individuals between the ages of 18 and 45 who have been diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis based on positive results from the Mill's and Cozen's tests. The participants must also have complaints of local tenderness at the elbow that lasts longer than six weeks. Additionally, to complete the assessment and get treatment, the participants' elbow must have a full extension range of motion

排除标准

  • •Individuals diagnosed with cervical radiculopathy, upper thoracic outlet syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, myositis ossificans, carpal tunnel syndrome, recent upper limb trauma, elbow immobilization, steroid injection administration within the previous six months, and any history of physical therapy administered within the previous six months were excluded from the study. Furthermore, participation will not be permitted for anyone who has previously experienced discomfort because of their profession

研究组 & 干预措施

group A

Active Comparator

maitland mobilization Posteroanterior mobilization of the radial head in motion. This method is gliding over the radial head posteriorly to anteriorly while the patient executes (and relaxes) the painful action (e.g., clutching). Repeat the method six to ten times if there is a noticeable increase in your ability to grip without pain

干预措施: Maitland joint mbilization (Other)

Group (B)

Active Comparator

mulligan mobilization Using this approach, the patient performs (and relaxes) the painful action (e.g., clutching) while a lateral humeroulnar auxiliary glide is applied and maintained. If you notice a noticeable increase in your ability to grip without pain, repeat the method six to ten times. You can use a belt to help you glide.Three sets of it were performed, with a 30-second break in between [44].

干预措施: mulligan mobilization (Other)

Group (c)

Experimental

radial nerve mobilization

干预措施: radial nerve mobilization (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

elbow pain

时间窗: At baseline and after 4 weeks

Assessment of pain intensity will be measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) which consists of a vertical line (0-10) where one end refers to no pain while the other end refers to great pain.) It is a reliable test for literate and illiterate patients 0.94I,0.71 respectively)

Hand grip strength

时间窗: At baseline and after 4 weeks

To assess hand grip strength, In order to assess grip strength painlessly, the patient will comfortably sit with their arm at their side, their shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated, their elbow flexed to 90 degrees \[38\], their forearm in a neutral position, their wrist between 0 and 30 degrees of extension, and their ulnar deviation between 0 and 15 degrees. The greatest grip contraction, expressed in kilograms, shall be noted when no discomfort is felt. The patient will squeeze for three to five seconds, as hard as they can. Multiple trials will be conducted, with an average of three repetitions recorded and a gap of approximately 15 seconds between each trial, to mitigate the possible effect of muscle fatigue

次要结局

  • functionality(At baseline and after 4 weeks)
  • pain pressure threshold(At baseline and after 4 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mohammad Moustafa Aldosoukki Hegazy

dr

Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparative Study Between Different Mobilization... | 临床试验