跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2019/07/020357
CTRI/2019/07/020357尚未招募4 期

A prospective randomized single blinded comparative study between intravenous propofol and inhalation sevoflurane for ease of classic laryngeal mask airway insertion in patients undergoing elective surgery

Midnapore Medical College1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 80 人开始时间: 2019年1月8日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
80
试验地点
1
主要终点
Sevoflurane is as good an induction agent as propofol and it is advantageous for its hemodynamic stability is our expected outcome.

研究概览

简要总结

To compare ease of insertion of classic laryngeal mask airway(LMA)  in patients undergoing elective surgery using intravenous propofol and inhalational sevoflurane. Propofol is the most commonly used induction agent for LMA insertion but it causes significant hemodynamic changes. On the other hand sevoflurane does not causes significant hemodynamic changes. Expected outcome of this study is sevoflurane is as good an induction agent as propofol and it is advantageous for its hemodynamic stability.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Computer generated randomization
盲法
Participant Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 65.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 1.ASA PS I & II
  • Weight between
  • 30 kg to 70 kg
  • Surgeries where LMA can be used.

排除标准

  • Unwilling patients
  • ASA III & IV
  • Allergy to propofol
  • Oral surgeries
  • Heavy smokers (more than 20 cigarettes in a day)
  • Upper respiratory tract infection
  • Emergency surgeries.
  • Conditions where LMA insertion could not be done after four attempts.

结局指标

主要结局

Sevoflurane is as good an induction agent as propofol and it is advantageous for its hemodynamic stability is our expected outcome.

时间窗: August 2019 to July 2020

次要结局

  • 1.To observe the hemodynamic changes among two study groups.(2.Complications of LMA insertion.)

研究者

申办方类型
Government medical college

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison between intravenous propofol (sleep... | 临床试验