跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04279756
NCT04279756已完成不适用

Comparing the Effects of Mobilization With Movement (MWM), Self MWM, and Dynamic Stretching on Hip Internal Rotation)

University of South Carolina2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 46 人开始时间: 2019年10月17日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
46
试验地点
2
主要终点
Degrees of change in hip internal range of motion measured using a bubble inclinometer

研究概览

简要总结

This study is looking to address the effectiveness of three different intervention on hip range of motion. There will be a therapist performed mobilization group, a self mobilization group, and a dynamic stretching group. Participants will be recruited from the University of South Carolina and randomly assigned between the three groups to have equal distribution and limit any biases. Participants will come in on two different days in order to receive the intervention on the first and have hip range of motion measured on both days. The investigators will be assessing if there is any significant difference between the three groups.

详细描述

The goal of this study is to compare the efficacy of three clinical interventions intended to treat hip dysfunctions such as hip osteoarthritis. Physical therapists utilize mobilization with movement clinically to increase range of motion that has been limited by hip pathology. This study will compare mobilization with movement administered by a physical therapist, self-administered mobilization with movement, in which patients are instructed in the maneuver and then perform it at home, and dynamic stretching as instructed by a physical therapist. Efficacy will be judged through changes in hip internal rotation range of motion, a motion which is typically limited in patients with hip pathology.

The objectives of the study are to quantify the effects of two different modalities of hip mobilization with movement and dynamic stretching in terms of hip internal rotation increases, and to inform current physical therapy practice by filling gaps in the literature surrounding the therapeutic effects of hip mobilization with movement. This study is intended to better equip physical therapists to select the most appropriate evidence-based interventions, thereby increasing the quality of patient care.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

The care provider (Cathy Arnot) was not blinded as she knew the groups of the participants. The Investigators and the Outcomes Assessors were blinded as they were not aware of the group each participant was placed in.

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • <30 degrees hip internal rotation in at least 1 hip

排除标准

  • Traumatic injury in last 6 months
  • surgery within last 6 months
  • positive FADDIR/FABER
  • symptomatic OA
  • Neurologic conditions

结局指标

主要结局

Degrees of change in hip internal range of motion measured using a bubble inclinometer

时间窗: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 24 hours after intervention

Degrees of change in hip internal range of motion will be measured before and after the intervention as well as a 24 hour follow up measurement to determine the duration of the increased range of motion before returning to baseline. All measurements will be taken using a bubble inclinometer which measures range of motion of a joint in degrees from 0-360.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Cathy Arnot

Clinical Associate Professor

University of South Carolina

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparing the Effects of Mobilization With Movement... | 临床试验