A Comparative Study Between Dissociative Treatment and Binocular Interactive Treatment in Amblyopia
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 80
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- visual acuity
研究概览
简要总结
Amblyopia is a unilateral or, infrequently, a bilateral reduction of best corrected visual acuity which cannot be attributed to coexisting eye or visual pathway disease. Amblyopia can be due to eye-crossing occurring in early childhood or due to error of refraction whether a high difference between the two eyes or very high bilateral refractive errors.Another cause could be visual deprivation like the presence of congenital cataract.
The prevalence of amblyopia worldwide is approximately 1%-5% .In Egypt, a study that was held in Upper Egypt, found that the prevalence of amblyopia was 1.49%, which is higher in rural areas than in urban areas.
Several modalities of treatment for amblyopia are available, yet occlusion treatment is the gold standard involving covering the good eye with a patch for a prescribed period of time ranging from 10 minutes daily to all waking hours. However, its effectiveness decreases in older children and adults.
Disadvantages include prolonged treatment leading to poor compliance, patching related distress, relationship strain and stigma. In extreme cases, non-compliance with patching results in a costly hospital admission to supervise the patching treatment. In addition, wearing a patch eliminates any advantage of binocularity. Not to mention that not all patients respond to patching and of those who do, many have residual amblyopia after treatment is stopped regardless of compliance. More importantly, binocular vision is not automatically restored once the vision in the amblyopic eye has been improved. In fact, once the patch is removed after therapy, the amblyopic eye could be suppressed by the better seeing eye and can lose some of the gains achieved as a result of therapy.
Another modality of treatment is atropine eye drops and optical penalisation which are usually secondary treatments to failed patching but carrying the same disadvantages as the ordinary patching.
Advances in amblyopia treatment include dichoptic training, perceptual learning, and video gaming. These depend on the fact that the adult brain has been shown to be much more plastic than it was once believed to be and hence have the advantage of expanding the age of response in adults.
Perceptual learning approaches have the advantage of being a dichoptic (binocular treatment using both eyes) approach which is independent of age and type of amblyopia.
A step further to conventional treatment is the use of a home-based approach allowing remote internet monitoring of treatment between office visits and hence better compliance. In addition a video game version of the treatment is developed to make it more enjoyable for improving compliance.
Our goal is to compare the outcome between the gold standard occlusion therapy and one of the dichoptic treatments.
详细描述
Introduction Amblyopia is a unilateral or, infrequently, a bilateral reduction of best corrected visual acuity which cannot be attributed to coexisting eye or visual pathway disease. Amblyopic eyes may have decreased contrast sensitivity and accommodation deficit. The fellow eye is not often normal but has subtle deficits.This can be explained by interocular suppression, or inhibition of the amblyopic eye by the strong eye, with psychophysical and physiological evidence.
Amblyopia can be classified as follows: 1) Strabismic occurring in early childhood 2) Refractive: a) Anisometropic b) High bilateral refractive errors 3) Visual deprivation.
The prevalence of amblyopia worldwide is approximately 1%-5%. In Egypt, a study that was held in Upper Egypt, found that the prevalence of amblyopia was 1.49%, which is higher in rural areas than in urban areas.
Several modalities of treatment for amblyopia are available, yet occlusion treatment is the gold standard involving covering the good eye with a patch for a prescribed period of time ranging from 10 minutes daily to all waking hours. However, its effectiveness decreases in older children and adults.
Disadvantages include prolonged treatment leading to poor compliance, patching related distress, relationship strain and stigma. In extreme cases, non-compliance with patching results in a costly hospital admission to supervise the patching treatment. In addition, wearing a patch eliminates any advantage of binocularity. Not to mention that not all patients respond to patching and of those who do, many have residual amblyopia after treatment is stopped regardless of compliance. More importantly, binocular vision is not automatically restored once the vision in the amblyopic eye has been improved. In fact, once the patch is removed after therapy, the amblyopic eye could be suppressed by the better seeing eye and can lose some of the gains achieved as a result of therapy.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 4 Years 至 30 Years（Child, Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Any degree of amblyopia
- •Orthotropia in primary position.
排除标准
- •Any ocular disease affecting vision
- •Angle of deviation in primary position (Heterotropia)
- •Adult patients and children's parents unwilling to enter or complete the study
- •Ignorance of patients to use the video game
研究组 & 干预措施
Group A
50 patients will receive the gold standard occlusion therapy
干预措施: eye patch (Device)
Group B
50 patients will receive dichoptic treatment in the form of playing a video game (Lazy Eye Blocks ®) while wearing a red/green goggle.
干预措施: dichoptic treatment (Device)
结局指标
主要结局
visual acuity
时间窗: 6 months
Best corrected visual acuity in the amblyopic eye
次要结局
- Compliance(6 months)
- crowding ratio(6 months)
研究者
Suha Ahmed Amin
Ophthalmology Specialist
Ain Shams University