Intermediate-dose Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation In cRitically-ill pATIents With COVID-19: An opeN Label Randomized Controlled Trial---A Randomized Trial of Atorvastatin vs. Placebo In Critically-ill Patients With COVID-19

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) -- a viral illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) -- has important manifestations outside the pulmonary parenchyma, including microthrombosis and macrothrombosis, with venous thrombosis being the most common form of thrombotic involvement. Existing studies, depending on the type of outcome assessment and type and dose of prophylaxis, have reported thrombotic events in 7-85% of patients with COVID-19.

However, the optimal antithrombotic regimen in these patients remains uncertain. Although many clinicians continue to consider standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation, other believe that more intense anticoagulation may reduce the thrombotic events, and improve outcomes. However, limited high-quality data exist to inform clinical practice and the existing guidelines recommendations are mostly based on expert opinion and consensus.

In addition, exuberant inflammatory response is known to play a role in the pathophysiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and COVID-19. It is possible that the pleiotropic effects of statins, which include anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic effects, prove beneficial in patients with severe COVID-19.

This study plans to investigate the safety and efficacy of two pharmacological regimens on outcomes of critically-ill patients with COVID-19 using a 2x2 factorial design.

First, patients will be assessed for the eligibility criteria for the anticoagulation hypothesis. Those meeting the criteria, will be assigned to intermediate versus standard dose prophylactic anticoagulation. These patients will subsequently be assessed for eligibility for the second randomization, and if meeting the criteria, will be assigned to atorvastatin 20mg/d or matching placebo.