跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00259064
NCT00259064已完成2 期

A Phase II Multicentre Randomised, Parallel Group, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of ZD1839 (IRESSATM) (250MG Tablet) Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus Placebo Plus BSC in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients With Advanced (Stage IIIB or IV) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Poor Performance Status

AstraZeneca1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 216 人开始时间: 2004年9月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
已完成
发起方
AstraZeneca
入组人数
216
试验地点
1
主要终点
To compare Iressa v best supportive care in terms of progression free survival

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of the study is to determine if the addition of Iressa to Best Supportive Care treatment will increase the progression free survival of chemo-naïve, poor performance status patients, with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 130 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC
  • NSCLC - locally advanced (Stage IIIB) or metastatic (stage IV) disease, not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy
  • Not suitable for chemotherapy
  • WHO Performance status 2 or 3

排除标准

  • Newly diagnosed CNS mets
  • Less than 4 weeks since completion of radiotherapy or persistence of any radiotherapy related toxicity
  • Other co-existing malignancies
  • ALT/AST greater than 5 x upper limit of normal
  • ANC less than 1.0 x 109/L or platelets less than 100 x 109/L

研究组 & 干预措施

Gefitinib

Experimental

ZD1839 + BSC (best supportive care)

干预措施: Gefitinib (Drug)

Placebo

Placebo Comparator

Placebo + BSC (best supportive care)

干预措施: Placebo (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

To compare Iressa v best supportive care in terms of progression free survival

时间窗: Progression-free survival

次要结局

  • To compare Iressa v best supportive care in terms of objective tumour response rate(Overall objective tumour response rate (CR and PR) according to the RECIST criteria)
  • To compare Iressa v best supportive care in terms of overall survival(Time to death)
  • To compare Iressa v best supportive care in terms of quality of life(Improvement in patient-reported functionality as measured by trial outcome index, comprised of the physical and functional well being sections and LCS of FACT-L and quality of life measured by the FACT-L total score)
  • To compare Iressa v best supportive care in terms of tolerability(Adverse event profile (type, frequency and severity of adverse events); laboratory parameters and vital signs)

研究者

发起方
AstraZeneca
申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验