Improving Health Equity for COVID-19 Vaccination and Related Health Behaviors for At-risk Populations Using Online Social Networks
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中(未招募)
- 入组人数
- 4,476
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- COVID-19 vaccination attitude
研究概览
简要总结
Social technologies for health have already become essential means for providing underserved populations greater social connectedness and increased access to novel health information. However, these technologies have also had negative unintended consequences. The resulting digital divide in social technology takes many forms - from explicit racism that excludes African American and Latinx populations from the resources enjoyed by White and Asian members of online communities, to self-segregation for the purposes of identity preservation and community-building that unintentionally results in limited informational diversity in underserved communities. The result is an often unnoticed, but highly consequential compounding of inequities.
This research seeks to use an online social network approach to address these challenges, in which the investigators demonstrate how reducing the online levels of network centralization and network homophily among African American community members directly increases their productive engagement with health-promoting information.
详细描述
To investigate the causal effects of network structure and composition on the acceptance of new or unfamiliar behavior-relevant health information, the investigators propose a randomized controlled experiment that compares several independent populations to identify and address participants' endorsement of biased information, and engagement with novel behavior relevant information (e.g., regarding COVID-19 vaccination). Each population will have its own network structure (i.e., level of centralization) and composition (i.e., level of homophily).
To run each experimental trial, the investigators will recruit 240 African American participants, aged 18 to 40, collectively to answer behavior-relevant questions over a period of no greater than 8 minutes. Participants can respond asynchronously - i.e., when the participants' time permits. As with previous studies, the technical infrastructure will manage participants' progress through the study to ensure that all participants have the relevant information about each other's responses.
To ensure causal identification, each network graph will constitute a single observation of how individual decisions change under conditions of interdependent social information. Thus, each trial of 240 people (6 networks x 40 participants per network) produces 6 observations of a community-level social learning process. Power calculations indicate that 8 independent trials are sufficient to produce results of p<0.05 with 85% power, resulting in a desired population of 1920 participants for each health topic (e.g., COVID-19 vaccination is a single "health topic"), producing 48 independent observations of collective decision making per health topic.
The studies will target health topics for which there is substantial racial disparity in outcomes and behavior, such as acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination, and spreading of various categories of COVID-19 misinformation (e.g. beliefs related to assessment of personal risk, effectiveness of protective behaviors, methods of transmission, disease prevention, treatment, origins of the virus) and related health practices (e.g. choice of appropriate contraceptive methods, value of heart disease screenings, etc.).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Factorial
- 主要目的
- Basic Science
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Having internet access
- •Aged 18 and above
- •Living in the United States
排除标准
- •Having no internet access
- •Aged below 18
- •Living outside of the United States
研究组 & 干预措施
Egalitarian Networks of Homogeneous Populations
Egalitarian networks are characterized by equal connectivity for all participants in an online network for information exchange. Each network is consisted of 40 individual participants. All network participants in this condition share similar baseline demographic characteristics, attitudes, or behavioral choices.
干预措施: Online Social Network and Collective Intelligence Intervention (Behavioral)
Egalitarian Networks of Diverse Populations
Egalitarian networks are characterized by equal connectivity for all participants in an online network for information exchange. Each network is consisted of 40 individual participants. All network participants in this condition have very different baseline demographic characteristics, attitudes, or behavioral choices.
干预措施: Online Social Network and Collective Intelligence Intervention (Behavioral)
Centralized Networks of Homogeneous Populations
Centralized networks have a small number of influential individuals, called "hubs," with connections to most other people. Centralized networks characterize situations in which most or all individuals are connected to, and seek advice from, a few well-connected "influencers." Each network is consisted of 40 individual participants. All network participants in this condition share similar baseline demographic characteristics, attitudes, or behavioral choices.
干预措施: Online Social Network and Collective Intelligence Intervention (Behavioral)
Centralized Networks of Diverse Populations
Centralized networks have a small number of influential individuals, called "hubs," with connections to most other people. Centralized networks characterize situations in which most or all individuals are connected to, and seek advice from, a few well-connected "influencers." Each network is consisted of 40 individual participants. All network participants in this condition have very different baseline demographic characteristics, attitudes, or behavioral choices.
干预措施: Online Social Network and Collective Intelligence Intervention (Behavioral)
Independent Control of Homogeneous Populations
Independent control condition does not have online networks. Participants in this condition are not put into online networks. Participants only respond to questions by themselves. All participants in this condition share similar baseline demographic characteristics, attitudes, or behavioral choices.
干预措施: Independent Control (Behavioral)
Independent Control of Diverse Populations
Independent control condition does not have online networks. Participants in this condition are not put into online networks. Participants only respond to questions by themselves. All participants in this condition have very different baseline demographic characteristics, attitudes, or behavioral choices.
干预措施: Independent Control (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
COVID-19 vaccination attitude
时间窗: Immediate after intervention
COVID-19 vaccination attitude scale, which is a self-reported scale measuring participants' attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination. The scale is consisted of 5 questions (e.g., "How much confidence do you have that the COVID-19 vaccine in the U.S. is safe and effective?") with responses ranging from 1 (No confidence at all) to 5 (A great deal of confidence); a higher average score means a more positive attitude in favor of COVID-19 vaccination.
COVID-19 vaccination intention
时间窗: Immediate after intervention
COVID-19 vaccination intention scale, which is a self-reported scale measuring participants' intention toward COVID-19 vaccination. The scale is consisted of 5 questions (e.g., "Would you get a COVID-19 vaccine when it is available to you?") with responses ranging from 1 (Definitely Not) to 5 (Definitely); a higher average score means a stronger intention to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.
COVID-19 vaccine safety perception
时间窗: Immediate after intervention
One question asks participant's estimation of one potential side effect from the COVID-19 vaccine. The question asks "According to the most recent data, for every 10 million people in the US vaccinated for COVID-19, how many experienced a severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis)? Answer must be between 0 and 10,000."
次要结局
- COVID-19 vaccine belief(Immediate after intervention)
研究者
Damon Centola, PhD
Professor of Communication, Sociology and Engineering
University of Pennsylvania
