跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05373342
NCT05373342尚未招募不适用

Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Role of a Novel Device in the Prevention of Retained Items In Childbirth Environment- Clinical Usability Pilot Study

The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust0 个研究点目标入组 70 人开始时间: 2026年9月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
70
主要终点
User experience about general look and feel and user satisfaction (overall perception) measured via staff questionnaire feedback

研究概览

简要总结

Accidentally retained surgical items or swabs are well-recognised errors that result in adverse consequences for patients. This error is one of the commonest "Never Events" - patient safety incidents that are considered preventable. Although uncommon, these incidents can have devastating consequences. Retained surgical items have 70% re-interventions, reaching 80% morbidity and 35% mortality.

Swabs or sponges are like small towels that soak up blood and body fluids so that the surgeon can visualise the operating area effectively. Swabs are used in all areas of surgery which include operations on the tummy, chest, limbs. They are also used in the vagina during childbirth, to assess for tears and to minimise blood oozing from the vagina.

The common risk factors for this error are out of hours surgical or childbirth procedures, multiple handovers in the care of the patient, raised BMI (Body Mass Index) and unplanned change to the operative intervention.

As the name suggests, a 'never event' should never happen in the first place. Never. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Incidents involving surgical swabs being left behind, particularly during a caesarean section or a perineal repair following a vaginal birth, are still happening despite over 100 years of institutional awareness of the problem and tentative solutions being implemented in clinical practice.

never-event incidents involving retained surgical swabs are a widespread problem affecting healthcare systems worldwide. It is therefore reasonable to ask the question: why are surgical swabs being left behind and what can be done to prevent this from happening?

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Midwifery lead and consultant lead patient older than 18 years.
  • Consented to participation after an informed choice.

排除标准

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Antenatal (before labour):
  • Patients who have a high risk of expected/unexpected maternal, fetal or neonatal deterioration such that during birth, the focus of attention would be towards safe patient care and observation required for using the swab-counter device system would not be possible such as :
  • Patients who are seriously unwell and require high dependency care.
  • Maternal cardiac conditions
  • Severe pre-eclampsia
  • Fetal anomalies where neonatal deterioration is expected (These will be relatively rare conditions where the doctor/midwife would decide to not recruit the patient)
  • Intrapartum and postpartum factors:
  • Patient having an emergency Caesarean section instead of a vaginal birth due to maternal or fetal indication.
  • Eclampsia (seizure/fitting in labour or after delivery)
  • Maternal cardiac conditions requiring high dependency care
  • Severe sepsis requiring high dependency care
  • Fetal anomalies where neonatal deterioration is expected

研究组 & 干预措施

iCount Device

A novel external device which can count the swabs and surgical tampons used during childbirth in an objective and validated manner.

干预措施: iCount system assembled with swabs (Device)

User Feedback Survey

Feedback will be taken from 20 users including midwives/ doctors.

Users will be emailed an online survey or given the same survey as a printout to complete.

All 20 users will also then also be approached to have a semi-structured interview.

10 of the users who first express interest will be interviewed.

结局指标

主要结局

User experience about general look and feel and user satisfaction (overall perception) measured via staff questionnaire feedback

时间窗: 12 months

User perception of how device works within current system measured via staff questionnaire feedback

时间窗: 12 months

Rate of device count accuracy (conspicuity of spotting a missing swab) measured via staff questionnaire feedback

时间窗: 12 months

User perception about the confidence about the accuracy of the count with use of the device and thoughts about intention to use, if available (functionality) measured via staff questionnaire feedback

时间窗: 12 months

User perception about the ease of learning of how to use the device measured via staff questionnaire feedback

时间窗: 12 months

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验