跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07398703
NCT07398703尚未招募不适用

"The Impact of Meropenem Strategy on Treatment Efficacy in Sepsis and Septic Shock : Extended vs. Intermittent Dosing in the ICU"

Assiut University0 个研究点目标入组 90 人开始时间: 2027年10月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
90
主要终点
All-cause mortality at 28 days from the date of randomization.

研究概览

简要总结

This observational study compares extended versus intermittent beta-lactam infusion in sepsis patients, assessing survival, clinical cure rates, and practical ICU challenges. The findings will guide optimal antibiotic protocols, potentially improving sepsis outcomes through precision dosing strategies.

详细描述

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Septic shock should be considered a subset of sepsis in which underlying circulatory, cellular, and metabolic abnormalities significantly increase mortality risk compared to sepsis alone.

Beta-lactam antibiotics exhibit broad-spectrum activity against most Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, making them a key component of sepsis treatment. Their bactericidal effects are time-dependent, meaning efficacy depends on maintaining free drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration of the target pathogen for an optimal duration.

In clinical practice, beta-lactams are typically administered via intermittent infusion. However, critically ill patients often experience altered pharmacokinetics due to changes in renal clearance, protein binding, fluid balance, and volume distribution. This variability can lead to unpredictable drug concentrations, increasing the risk of subtherapeutic antibiotic exposure.

Existing studies suggest that continuous infusion may enhance beta-lactam efficacy by maintaining drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration for longer periods, optimizing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets. Some meta-analyses and small randomized controlled trials report reduced mortality and improved clinical cure rates with continuous infusion, while others show no significant difference. However, differences in dosing regimens, patient populations, and pharmacokinetic variability in critically ill patients make it difficult to draw firm conclusions.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Aged: 18 - 65
  • Patients admitted to critical care unit diagnosed with pneumonia with two of the following:
  • Temperature: over 38 degree celsius
  • Heart rate: over 100 beats per minute
  • Respiratory rate: over 20 breaths per minute
  • leucocyte count over than 12000 or less than 4000 microlitres or over 10% immature forms or bands
  • Patients with positive sputum

排除标准

  • Hypersensitivity to Beta-lactams
  • Pregnancy
  • Very low probability of survival using APAACHE II score > 34 points.
  • Immunodeficency or taking immunosuppressive medications
  • Acute or chronic renal failure with creatinine clearance less than 30 ml/min according to Cockcroft-Gault formula.

研究组 & 干预措施

Group A

Extended infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics

干预措施: Extended beta-lactam antibiotics (Drug)

Group B

Intermittent infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics

干预措施: Intermittent Beta-lactam antibiotics (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

All-cause mortality at 28 days from the date of randomization.

时间窗: Baseline and 28 days

All-cause mortality at 90 days from the date of randomization.

时间窗: Baseline and 90 days

次要结局

  • Clinical cure(Baseline and 16 days)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mostafa Yousif Sadik Sayed

Resident physician

Assiut University

相似试验

Extended vs. Intermittent Meropenem Infusion in... | 临床试验