跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06019650
NCT06019650招募中不适用

Elderly Culturally Adapted Manual Assisted Brief Psychological Therapy (E-CMAP) for Older Adults With Suicidal Ideation: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial From Pakistan

Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 192 人开始时间: 2023年11月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
192
试验地点
2
主要终点
Suicidal Ideation

研究概览

简要总结

determine the efficacy of culturally adapted manual assisted brief psychological intervention for older adults (E-CMAP) with suicidal ideation

详细描述

Suicide is a serious public health concern. Each year more than 800,000 people worldwide die due to suicide. Most of these (79%) are in the low and middle-income countries (LMIC), with an increased risk of suicide in ageing.

Primary Objective: To assess the effectiveness of E-CMAP compared to Treatment as Usual (TAU) as measured by reduction in suicidal ideation third month post-randomization with Beck Scale for Suicidal ideation (BSI) (Beck & Steer, 1991) Secondary outcomes: the two groups will be compared on hopelessness, depression, quality of life, coping skills, participant satisfaction, health/social care usage, and episodes of self-harm. All variables known to be related to suicide risk.

The study will be carried out in two stages. First stage will be cultural adaptation and refinement of the intervention and second stage will be feasibility Randomised Control Trial (RCT).

Stage 1: In the first stage, the adaptation of the intervention for suicidal ideation in older adults will be carried out by a group of experts including a master trainer, a bilingual health expert, mental health professional potential user (i.e., older adults with suicidal ideation), and a senior therapist through discussion groups.

Stage 2: Feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) After adaptation, the intervention will be tested in a multicenter RCT to determine the efficacy of culturally adapted manual assisted brief psychological intervention for older adults/elderly (E-CMAP) with suicidal ideation.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
50 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • In the context of this study, suicidal ideation is defined as; "Passive thoughts about wanting to be dead or active thoughts about killing oneself, these thoughts may include plan but not accompanied by preparatory behavior" (Griffin et al., 2020)
  • 50 years and above
  • Has recent history of experiencing suicidal ideation
  • Participants living within the catchment area of the participating practices and hospitals.
  • Capacity to give informed consent.

排除标准

  • Unable to provide consent due to severe mental or physical illness.
  • Unlikely to be available for outcome assessments (temporary residence)

结局指标

主要结局

Suicidal Ideation

时间窗: change in total scores from baseline to 3-month post randomization assessment

Participants suicidal ideation will be assessed using the Beck scale for suicidal ideation. Higher scores on the questionnaire indicate greater severity of suicidal ideation. Scores provide a measure of the severity of self-reported hopelessness: 0-3 minimal, 4-8 mild, 9-14 moderate, and 15-20 severe.

次要结局

  • Hopelessness(change in total scores from baseline to 3-month post randomization assessment)
  • Depression(change in total scores from baseline to 3-month post randomization assessment)
  • Health-related Quality of Life(change in total scores from baseline to 3-month post randomization assessment)
  • Coping Resource Inventory(change in total scores from baseline to 3-month post randomization assessment)
  • Client Satisfaction Questionaire(level of satisfaction at end of intervention i.e., 3-month post-randomization)
  • Service Usage(change in total scores from baseline to 3-month post randomization assessment)
  • Episodes of Self-harm(change in total scores from baseline to 3-month post randomization assessment)
  • Problem Solving Skills(change in total scores from baseline to 3-month post randomization assessment)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验