跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03206515
NCT03206515Unknown不适用

The 18F Peel-way Sheath Versus the 18F Access Sheath With a Suction-evacuation Function MPCNL for the Management of 2-5cm Size Kidney Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 86 人开始时间: 2016年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
86
试验地点
1
主要终点
The renal pelvic pressure

研究概览

简要总结

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) has been considered as the first-line choice for the management of >20mm kidney stones. Microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini PCNL) which takes nephrolithotomy channel size less than or equal to 18, was first used in the treatment of children with kidney stones in 1997, then gradually applied to adult, aims to achieve the similar stone clearance rate as the standard channels, at the same time, reduce the complications. At present, the use of percutaneous renal surgery in our country is more than 18F plastic peel-away sheath, with the access sheath with a suction-evacuation function was first used by Guohua Zeng and so on. But there is still a lack of high quality evidence of Evidence-based medical evidence to compare the two kinds of sheath for the safety and effectiveness. Therefore, this study provides a reliable theoretical basis for the choice of the sheath for the treatment of 2-5cm size Kidney, and ultimately benefit patients with 20mm.

详细描述

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) has been considered as the first-line choice for the management of >20mm kidney stones. Microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini PCNL) which takes nephrolithotomy channel size less than or equal to 18, was first used in the treatment of children with kidney stones in 1997, then gradually applied to adult, aims to achieve the similar stone clearance rate as the standard channels, at the same time, reduce the complications. At present, the use of percutaneous renal surgery in our country is more than 18F plastic peel-away sheath, with the access sheath with a suction-evacuation function was first used by Guohua Zeng and so on. But there is still a lack of high quality evidence of Evidence-based medical evidence to compare the two kinds of sheath for the safety and effectiveness. Therefore, this study provides a reliable theoretical basis for the choice of the sheath for the treatment of 2-5cm size Kidney, and ultimately benefit patients with 20mm.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients consent for percutaneous renal stone removal
  • Age 18 to 70 years
  • Normal renal function
  • ASA score Ⅰ and Ⅱ
  • Renal stones 20-50mm

排除标准

  • Patients with solitary kidney
  • Uncorrected coagulopathy and active urinary tract infection (UTI)
  • Morbid obese patients
  • Patients who underwent transplant or urinary diversion
  • Congenital abnormalities
  • Patients will be excluded from the study if the undergoing standard PNL/mini-perc have purulent fluid in the initial puncture

结局指标

主要结局

The renal pelvic pressure

时间窗: During the procedure

To measure the renal pelvic pressure during mini-PCNL procedure

次要结局

  • Perioperative complications(Intraoperatively or ≤ 1 month postoperatively)

研究者

发起方
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Guohua Zeng

Vice President of the Hospital

The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验