Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques to Optimize the Treatment of Gingival Recessions Using a Gingival Graft Substitute.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 20
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Comparing changes for Root coverage measure (in millimeter) from baseline at 3, 6 and 12 months
研究概览
简要总结
Gingival recessions are often successfully treated by coronally advanced flap technique (CAF) associated with subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG). Currently the xenogeneic collagen matrix (CM) has been used as a substitute for SCTG associated with CAF technique for root coverage. CAF technique was not developed for use with CM and has shown limited results when applied to the CM. The aim of this study was to compare and show the benefits of the extended flap technique (EFT) compared to CAF technique using CM for root coverage.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 25 Years 至 50 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •ages 25 to 50 years old
- •bilateral gingival recession type Miller class I or II
- •with 3 mm in height and less than 3mm of keratinized tissue
- •non-molar teeth
排除标准
- •diabetics
- •pregnant women
- •chronic use of medication
- •periodontitis
结局指标
主要结局
Comparing changes for Root coverage measure (in millimeter) from baseline at 3, 6 and 12 months
时间窗: Change from Baseline at 3, 6 and 12 months
At the mid-buccal point of the involved tooth, the gingival recession height was measure by the same operator, who was previously calibrated (intra-examiner calibration) using a digital paquimeter.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Arthur Belem Novaes Jr
Professor
University of Sao Paulo