跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07747974
NCT07747974招募中不适用

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Versus Mirror Therapy on Grip Strength, Manual Dexterity, and Spasticity in Children With Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Ibadat International University, Islamabad1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 42 人开始时间: 2026年3月3日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
42
试验地点
1
主要终点
Grip Strength

研究概览

简要总结

This randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the effectiveness of Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (MCIMT) and Mirror Therapy in improving upper limb function among children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Upper limb dysfunction, including reduced grip strength, impaired manual dexterity, and increased spasticity, limits functional independence and participation in daily activities in these children. Although both interventions are widely used in pediatric rehabilitation, direct comparative evidence remains limited.

A total of 42 children aged 5-9 years diagnosed with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy were recruited from Akbar Kare Institute and Comprehensive Physical Rehabilitation Center, Peshawar. Participants were selected through convenience sampling and randomly allocated into two equal groups using the sealed envelope method. Group A received Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy, while Group B received Mirror Therapy. Both groups received treatment for 30 minutes per session, five sessions per week, for six consecutive weeks.

Grip strength was assessed using the Hand-Held Dynamometer, manual dexterity using the Box and Block Test, and spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale. The findings of this study provide evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of these two rehabilitation approaches and may assist clinicians in selecting the most appropriate intervention for improving upper limb function in children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy.

详细描述

This study employed a parallel-group randomized controlled trial design to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Mirror Therapy. Following ethical approval, eligible participants were recruited according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. After obtaining informed consent from parents or guardians, baseline assessments were performed.

Participants were randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups. Both groups received standardized treatment sessions lasting 30 minutes, five days per week for six weeks. Outcome measures included grip strength measured with a Hand-Held Dynamometer, manual dexterity measured using the Box and Block Test, and spasticity measured using the Modified Ashworth Scale. Assessments were conducted before and after completion of the intervention period. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Version 26 with a significance level of p < 0.05.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
5 Years 至 9 Years(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Children aged 5-9 years.
  • •Male and female participants.
  • •Diagnosed with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy.
  • •Modified Ashworth Scale Grade 1 or 1+.
  • •Able to understand and follow verbal commands.

排除标准

  • •Severe fixed hand deformity.
  • •Cognitive impairment.
  • •Severe visual impairment.
  • •Uncontrolled seizures.
  • •Previous upper limb surgery.

研究组 & 干预措施

Mirror Therapy

Active Comparator

Participants received Mirror Therapy for 30 minutes per session, five sessions per week for six weeks, together with conventional physiotherapy.

干预措施: Control (Other)

Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

Experimental

Participants received MCIMT for 30 minutes per session, five sessions per week for six weeks, together with conventional physiotherapy.

干预措施: Experimental (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Grip Strength

时间窗: Assessment Time: Baseline and 6 Weeks

Instrument: Hand-Held Dynamometer

次要结局

  • Manual Dexterity(Assessment Time: Baseline and 6 Weeks)
  • Spasticity(Assessment Time: Baseline and 6 Weeks)

研究者

发起方
Ibadat International University, Islamabad
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Hafsah Arshad

Assistant professor

Ibadat International University, Islamabad

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验