COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PHARYNGOLARYNGEAL MORBIDITY FOLLOWING PROSEAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY INSERTION USING SUCTION CATHETER GUIDED VERSUS INTRODUCER TOOL GUIDED TECHNIQUE
试验速览
- 阶段
- Phase 3 4
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 64
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Comparing the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity with the use of suction catheter guided technique versus standard introducer tool guided technique during proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion with regard to incidence of sore throat
研究概览
简要总结
We propose to Compare the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity with the use of suction catheter guided technique versus standard introducer toll guided technique during Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway insertion with regard to incidence of sore throat, Hoarseness of voice ,Dysphagia, Cough, Oral/ pharyngeal trauma / presence of blood on device , Post operative sore throat score and time required for Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway insertion.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 65.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •ASA Grade 1 and 2
- •Patient undergoing elective surgery requiring General Anaesthesia.
排除标准
- •1.Pregnant Women 2.Patients requiring Endotracheal Intubation 3.Limited mouth opening 4.Known bleeding or coagulation disorder.
结局指标
主要结局
Comparing the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity with the use of suction catheter guided technique versus standard introducer tool guided technique during proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion with regard to incidence of sore throat
时间窗: 1. Baseline | 2. 30 minutes post pLMA Removal | 3. 2 hour post pLMA Removal
次要结局
- Incidence of(a. Hoarseness of voice)
研究者
Dr Kush RC
VMMC and SAFDARJUNG HOSPITAL