Comparison of Two Different Initial Entry Portals of Care for Patients Seeking Care for Musculoskeletal Pain: A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 150
- 试验地点
- 4
- 主要终点
- Physical function on the 10-item short form PROMIS global health measure
研究概览
简要总结
This study is a randomized controlled trial conducted at two clinical sites. The purpose of this study is to determine whether patients with musculoskeletal injuries do better by seeing a primary care provider first versus seeing a physical therapist first. Target enrollment is 150 subjects.
详细描述
Physical therapists have an important role as initial contact providers for individuals with musculoskeletal disorders. Health care expenditures are on the rise each year in the U.S. and a large proportion is due to musculoskeletal disorders. Despite the rise in spending, there has not been an improvement in outcomes for individuals with musculoskeletal disorders. Furthermore, increased medical spending and utilization could expose patients to iatrogenic harm. Comparative effectiveness studies of different portals of entry would help to determine the most effective pathways for individuals with musculoskeletal disorders to seek care. The purpose of this study is to determine whether patients with musculoskeletal injuries do better by seeing a primary care provider first versus seeing a physical therapist first. Subjects will be enrolled from two sites (Temple University, Philadelphia, PA and Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX). Patient self-reported outcomes measures will be collected at baseline and 6 weeks. At 6 months, healthcare utilization will be assessed. The investigators plan to enroll a target sample size of 75 subjects per site (150 total). Descriptive statistics will be computed to characterize the 2 treatment groups with ANCOVA being used to assess differences between treatment groups at 6 weeks, adjusting for baseline values, evaluating the assumption of parallel slopes. The investigators will further investigate sources of systematic differences in response to treatment using methods such as generalized estimating equations and linear mixed effects models. This research will be the first multi-site study to compare effectiveness of these two pathways for individuals with musculoskeletal pain in the U.S. With a growing older adult population, the percentage of individuals who have musculoskeletal pain in the U.S. will only increase over time. This research study is timely and could meet the need for identifying the most effective pathway for individuals with musculoskeletal pain to seek care.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Factorial
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •A patient at Temple University Employee Health, OR, Brooke Army Medical Center.
- •Able to speak English sufficiently to understand informed consent
- •A patient with a musculoskeletal condition as their primary complaint
- •Greater than 18 years old
- •Within 90 days (3 months) of either initial musculoskeletal onset or repeat acute recurrence of a previous episode
排除标准
- •Patients have already sought care from provider for their presenting condition for this current episode
- •Patients have an insurance plan that requires them to see an outside provider prior to seeing the study providers
研究组 & 干预措施
Physical Therapist
Participants randomized to this arm will receive care from a physical therapist first.
干预措施: Physical Therapist (Other)
Primary Care Provider
Participants randomized to this arm will receive care from a primary care provider first.
干预措施: Primary Care Provider (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Physical function on the 10-item short form PROMIS global health measure
时间窗: 6 weeks
次要结局
- Patient Satisfaction on a Likert scale(6 weeks)
- Acceptability of Symptom State on the PASS(6 weeks)
- Percentage of Subjects using Over-the-counter or Prescription Medication to Assess Medication Usage(6 weeks)
- Number of Physical Therapy or Medical Appointments or Tests orders as a Measure of Health care utilization(6 months)
- Physical function on the Patient Specific Functional Scale(6 weeks)
- Overall Improvement on the Global Rating of Change(6 weeks)
- Number of Limited or Light Duty Days to Measure Work Status(6 weeks)
- Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability(6 weeks)
- Presenteeism as Measured by Participation at Work on Likert Scale(6 weeks)