跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02021396
NCT02021396已完成不适用

Benefit of Prophylactic Embolization of the Splenic Salvage in Trauma Patients at High Risk of Splenectomy.

University Hospital, Grenoble2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 140 人开始时间: 2014年2月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
140
试验地点
2
主要终点
Rescue rate

研究概览

简要总结

The main objective is to show that splenic embolization improves salvage rate at one month in a population of hemostatically stable closed splenic trauma patients with a high risk of splenectomy

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 74 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients aged over 18 and under 75 years
  • hemodynamically stable patients (systolic BP ≥ 90 mm Hg and no hemorrhagic shock)
  • Suffered a closed splenic trauma within the last 48 hours
  • A high risk of splenectomy:
  • Reaching spleen Moore grade 4 and 5 in the abdominal injected CT or
  • Reaching spleen Moore 3 and at least one of the following characteristics:
  • Important Hemoperitoneum (when visible in the pelvic area).
  • Severe associated impairment (NISS-New Injury Severity Score greater than or equal to 15)
  • Patients volunteering to participate in the study, having signed the consent form or with the agreement of the family if the patient is not capable of giving consent; after adequate information and delivery of the patient and/or family information leaflet.
  • covered by a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a plan.

排除标准

  • Patients whose usual residence is outside the European Economic Community
  • Patient with hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure <9 despite resuscitation maneuver)
  • Patient with open splenic trauma
  • Patient with surgical indication excluding the possibility of monitoring splenic trauma
  • Patient with an indication for embolization of a body other than the spleen at the time of inclusion
  • Patient with an indication for splenic embolization as a result of a post-traumatic vascular anomaly (active leakage of contrast agent, pseudoaneurysm or early splenic arteriovenous fistula).
  • Patients aged less than 18 years and ≥ 75 years
  • Patients with a previous spleen disease (tumor, infection, vascular anomaly intrasplenically)
  • Patient with trauma Moore grade 1 or 2
  • Patient with trauma grade Moore 5 with total ischemia of the spleen
  • Patients who underwent partial or total splenectomy before inclusion
  • Patient having acquired or innate immune deficiency
  • All indications not permitting the achievement of embolization
  • Pregnant woman
  • Person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, person subject to a measure of legal protection.
  • Patient currently participating in a clinical study or having participated in a clinical study in the month preceding the inclusion
  • Patient with a condition or a history of mental or psychiatric disorder or any other factor limiting their ability to participate in an informed manner and to comply with the protocol.

研究组 & 干预措施

Embolization

Experimental

this arm of the study was interventional (embolization) with CT scans at inclusion (D0, to validate the inclusion criteria), at one month (D30-validating the primary endpoint) and at 6 months (D180) read by 2 expert radiologists blinded to the study arm

干预措施: Embolization (Procedure)

Surveillance

No Intervention

this arm of the study was non-interventional (surveillance), with CT scans at inclusion (D0, to validate the inclusion criteria), at one month (D30-validating the primary endpoint) and at 6 months (D180 ) read by 2 expert radiologists blinded to the study arm

结局指标

主要结局

Rescue rate

时间窗: Splenic Rescue at 30 days

The main objective is to show that splenic embolization improves salvage rate at one month in a population of hemostatically stable closed splenic trauma patients with a high risk of a splenectomy. The primary endpoint is an immunocompetent spleen i.e. intact or treated by surgical methods for splenic preservation of at least 50% of splenic vascularized tissue in the event of secondary laparotomy or with necrosis of less than 50% by volume. This criterion will be validated by a review of the initial scans by a panel of two senior radiologists blinded to the study arm.

次要结局

  • Mortality(At 1 and 6 months)
  • Morbidity(at 1 and 6 months)

研究者

发起方
University Hospital, Grenoble
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Benefit of Prophylactic Embolization of the Splenic... | 临床试验