跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01626729
NCT01626729已完成不适用

Facts-Up-Front Versus Traffic-Light Food Labels: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Yale University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 703 人开始时间: 2011年5月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
703
试验地点
1
主要终点
Nutrient Comparison and Nutrient Level Estimation Accuracy

研究概览

简要总结

The U.S. food and beverage industry recently released a new front-of-package nutrition labeling system called Facts Up Front that will be used on thousands of food products. The purpose of this study was to test consumer understanding of the Facts Up Front nutrition labeling system compared to the Multiple Traffic Light system (Traffic Light). Facts Up Front displays grams/milligrams and % daily value information for various nutrients; Traffic Light uses an interpretive color-coded scheme to alert consumers to low, medium or high levels of certain nutrients. Participants in an Internet-based study were randomized to one of five front-of-package label conditions: 1) No Label; 2) Traffic Light; 3) Traffic Light plus information about protein and fiber (Traffic Light+); 4) Facts Up Front; or 5) Facts Up Front plus information about "nutrients to encourage" (Facts Up Front+). Total percentage correct quiz scores were generated reflecting participants' ability to compare two foods on nutrient levels, based on their labels, and to estimate amounts of saturated fat, sugar, sodium, fiber and protein in foods. 703 adult participants recruited through an online database in May 2011 participated in this Internet-based study and data were analyzed in June 2011. The investigators hypothesized that the Traffic Light label groups would perform better than the Facts Up Front groups on all outcomes.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Participants in Survey Sampling International Panels

排除标准

  • •Younger than 18 years old

研究组 & 干预措施

Facts Up Front

Experimental

干预措施: Facts Up Front (Behavioral)

Facts Up Front+

Experimental

干预措施: Facts Up Front+ (Behavioral)

No front of package label

Placebo Comparator

干预措施: No label control group (Behavioral)

Traffic Light+

Experimental

干预措施: Traffic Light+ (Behavioral)

Traffic Light

Experimental

干预措施: Traffic Light (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Nutrient Comparison and Nutrient Level Estimation Accuracy

时间窗: Baseline

Participants took a nutrient level comparison quiz asking them to identify which of two products presented side-by-side in the same food category were higher or lower in different nutrients. Participants also viewed 8 individual products and estimated whether the product had low, medium or high amounts of saturated fat, sugar, sodium, fiber, and protein. The primary outcomes were total percentage correct on these quizzes.

Perceptions of Health, Taste and Purchase Intent

时间窗: Baseline

Participants rated how healthy they thought each individual product was, how good it would taste and their likelihood to buy the product for themselves and their children (answered only by those who reported having children) using a 9-point Likert scale. Each set of ratings was averaged across eight products.

次要结局

  • Consumer Label Preferences(Baseline)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Christina Roberto

Principal Investigator

Yale University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验