跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02041507
NCT02041507已完成不适用

A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Air Insufflation, Water Immersion and Water Exchange for Adenoma Detection Rate in Screening Colonoscopy

Presidio Ospedaliero Santa Barbara4 个研究点 分布在 3 个国家目标入组 1,224 人开始时间: 2014年2月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
1,224
试验地点
4
主要终点
Adenoma Detection Rate.

研究概览

简要总结

The degree of protection afforded by colonoscopy against proximal colorectal cancer (CRC) appears to be related to the quality of the procedure, and the incomplete removal of lesions has been shown to increase the subsequent risk of developing a colon cancer.

Some studies suggest that small polyps with advanced histology are more common in the right than in the left colon (right colon proximal to splenic flexure, left colon distal to the splenic flexure). The average size of polyps in the right colon with advanced pathology or containing adenocarcinoma was ≤9 mm, whereas in the left colon their average size was >9 mm, P<0.001. Inadequate prevention of right-sided CRC incidence and mortality may be due to right-sided polyps with advanced histology or that harbor malignancy. These presumptive precursors of cancer are smaller and possibly more easily obscured by residual feces, and more likely to be missed at colonoscopy.

Water-aided colonoscopy (WAC) can be subdivided broadly into two major categories: water immersion (WI), characterized by suction removal of the infused water predominantly during the withdrawal phase of colonoscopy, and water exchange (WE), characterized by suction removal of infused water predominantly during the insertion phase of colonoscopy.

In some reports WE appeared to be superior to both WI and air insufflation colonoscopy (AI) in terms of pain reduction and adenoma detection, particularly for <10 mm adenomas in the proximal colon.

In this multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) we test the hypothesis that that WE, compared to AI and WI, will enhance overall Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) in CRC screening patients. Confirmation of the primary hypothesis will provide evidence that WE enhances the quality of screening colonoscopy.

We also hypothesize that WE may be more effective in detecting proximal colon adenomas than WI and AI, particularly <10 mm adenomas, thus increasing proximal colon ADR and proximal colon ADR <10 mm. Confirmation of secondary hypotheses will provide justification for further testing that WE may provide a strategy to improve prevention of colorectal cancer by increasing detection of adenomas in screening colonoscopy.

Unlike previous reports of single colonoscopist studies, the insertion and withdrawal phases of colonoscopy will be done by different investigators. The second investigator will be blinded to the method used to insert the instrument, thus eliminating possible bias about procedure related issues.

Several secondary outcomes will also be analysed.

详细描述

Design: Prospective double-blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial. Methods: Colonoscopy with Air Insufflation, Water Immersion, Water Exchange to aid insertion of colonoscope; split dose bowel preparation. Sedation available at the start of the procedure or on-demand.

Control method: Air insufflation colonoscopy. Study methods: Water Immersion colonoscopy, Water Exchange colonoscopy.

Population: Consecutive 50 to 70 year-old screening patients. After informed consent, assignment to control or study arms based on computer generated randomization list with block allocation and stratification.

Primary outcome: overall Adenoma Detection Rate. Secondary outcomes: proximal colon ADR, Mean Adenomas resected per Procedure (MAP), cecal intubation rate and time, total procedure time (including biopsy and/or polypectomy), maximum pain during colonoscopy assessed during insertion and at discharge, the need for sedation/analgesia and its dosage. In addition loop reduction maneuvers, position changes, abdominal compression, the amount of infused and suctioned water during insertion and withdrawal, and patients willingness to repeat the examination will be evaluated.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
50 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •consecutive screening patients

排除标准

  • •previous colonoscopy within 5 years
  • •surveillance colonoscopy
  • •previous colorectal surgery
  • •indication for a proctosigmoidoscopy or bidirectional endoscopy
  • •history of inflammatory bowel disease
  • •patient refusal or inability to provide informed consent
  • •inadequate consumption of bowel preparation

研究组 & 干预措施

Air insufflation method.

Active Comparator

Colonoscopy performed in the standard fashion, with the minimal air insufflation required to aid insertion and allowing for washing as needed. Considered to be standard procedure.

干预措施: Air insufflation method. (Other)

Water Immersion method.

Experimental

Infusion of water during the insertion phase of colonoscopy mainly to open the colonic lumen and progress to the cecum immersed in the water environment thus created, without attempting to clear the colon contents. Residual air in the colon will not be removed. Infused water and residual feces will be suctioned back predominantly during withdrawal. Insufflation not used until the cecum is reached. It will be allowed only 3 times and no more than 10 seconds each time (ITT failure if >3) if the lumen cannot be seen. Withdrawal phase done using air insufflation.

干预措施: Water Immersion method. (Other)

Water Exchange method.

Experimental

Insufflation not used until the cecum is reached. Infusion of a sufficient amount of water to render the lumen of the colon a slit to progress with the colonoscope. Part of the infused water will be constantly suctioned back exchanging clean for dirty or hazy water. Air pockets will be always aspirated to collapse the lumen. After cecal intubation as much residual water as possible will be aspirated before beginning the withdrawal phase. During withdrawal residual water and feces will be suctioned. Withdrawal phase done using air insufflation.

干预措施: Water Exchange method. (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Adenoma Detection Rate.

时间窗: 18 months.

Proportion of subjects with at least one adenoma of any size.

次要结局

  • Pain score at discharge.(1 hour.)
  • Proximal colon Adenoma Detection Rate.(18 months.)
  • Cecal intubation time.(1 hour.)
  • Cecal intubation rate.(1 hour.)
  • Proximal colon <10 mm Adenoma Detection Rate.(18 months.)
  • Mean adenomas resected per procedure.(18 months.)
  • Maximum pain score recorded during insertion phase of colonoscopy.(1 hour.)
  • Total procedure time.(1 hour.)
  • Need for sedation/analgesia and its dosage(1 hour.)

研究者

发起方
Presidio Ospedaliero Santa Barbara
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Sergio Cadoni, M.D.

Responsabile Servizio Endoscopia Digestiva

Presidio Ospedaliero Santa Barbara

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Water-aided Colonoscopy vs Air Insufflation... | 临床试验