跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04038775
NCT04038775Unknown不适用

Take 2 Pills and Go Volunteer in the Morning: A Feasibility Study of Engaging Patients as Volunteers

Loyola University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2019年5月28日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
Total volunteer hours

研究概览

简要总结

In this study, doctors will "prescribe" volunteer work for their patients. The investigators are determining whether it is feasible for providers to recommend volunteering to their patients, and whether patients who are recommended this "treatment" actually do volunteer work (i.e., find it "acceptable"). The study is focused on uninsured patients at Loyola Medicine's Access to Care (ATC) Clinic. The study's secondary aim is to determine whether or not engaging in volunteer work yields health benefits.

详细描述

In this feasibility study, doctors will "prescribe" volunteer work for their patients. The setting is Loyola Medicine's Access to Care Clinic, which serves patients who are low-income and uninsured (and often members of racial/ethnic minority groups). The investigators are determining whether it is feasible for providers in a low-resourced primary care setting to recommend volunteering to their patients, and whether patients who are recommended this "treatment" actually do volunteer work (and how much). The investigators are also interested in measuring whether volunteering is associated with any potential health benefits, specifically well-being and self-esteem.

Promoting volunteerism is the intervention because research evidence suggests that volunteer work may be good for one's health. For example, research shows that volunteering is associated with numerous potential health benefits: improved mental health, increased physical activity, higher preventive health care utilization, lower cardiovascular risk and lower mortality. Besides better health, volunteering also can teach valuable skills, help individuals meet others, and foster new relationships.

Despite all these potential benefits, rates of volunteering are low. Overall, just one in four people volunteers. Additionally, people who have lower incomes are less likely to volunteer (14% of people with incomes below $20,000 vs. 35% of people with incomes above $100,000. And minority groups are less likely to volunteer than whites (just 19% of African Americans and 15% of Latinos compared with 26% of Whites).

Thus, the intervention is aimed to increase volunteer participation rates among groups unlikely to volunteer: low-income uninsured persons who are members of racial/ethnic minority groups.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •* Access to Care patient

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Volunteering

Experimental

The experimental arm will receive a volunteer "prescription" from their provider and assistance from a study team member to find a volunteer job.

干预措施: Volunteering (Behavioral)

Control

No Intervention

The control arm will not be recommended to volunteer or assisted in finding a volunteer activity. They will answer the same survey questions as the intervention subjects.

结局指标

主要结局

Total volunteer hours

时间窗: Baseline to six months

Investigators will sum the reported volunteer hours, which will be tracked at baseline and monthly for 6 months.

次要结局

  • Change in Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Score(Baseline to six months)
  • Change in the Arizona Integrative Outcomes Scale(Baseline to six months)
  • Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Short Form Scale(Baseline to six months)

研究者

发起方
Loyola University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Julie Darnell

Associate Professor

Loyola University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验