Fiber-Reinforced Versus Bulk-Fill Flowable Resin Composite Dentin Replacement Materials: 4-Year Clinical Performance in Class II Cavities
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 120
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Fracture of restorative material and restoration retention
研究概览
简要总结
the current study was conducted to evaluate and compare the flowable short fiber-reinforced (SFRC) and flowable bulk-fill resin composites (BFCs) regarding their 4-year clinical performance as dentin replacement materials in class II cavities.
详细描述
the current study was conducted to evaluate and compare the flowable short fiber-reinforced (SFRC) and flowable bulk-fill resin composites (BFCs) regarding their 4-year clinical performance as dentin replacement materials in class II cavities. Forty patients were enrolled in the study. Each patient received three class II cavities; one of them was restored with flowable SFRC for dentin replacement, while in the other two cavities, dentin was replaced with two different flowable BFCs. The three dentin replacements were veneered with one particulate filler resin composite (PFC) (Essentia, GC). World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria were used for clinical assessment of the restorations at 1-week (baseline), 6, 12, 18-months, 2, 3, and 4-year intervals.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 40 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •having good oral hygiene.
- •having at least 3 posterior teeth with moderate to large primary proximal carious lesions (score 4 or 5 ICDAS).
- •ranging in age from 20 to 40 years.
- •with normal occlusion.
- •accepting to participate in the study by signing an Arabic-written consent according to the regulations of the Mansoura University Ethical Committee.
排除标准
- •bad oral hygiene.
- •severe chronic periodontitis.
- •having installed orthodontic appliances.
- •abnormal occlusion.
- •parafunctional habits or allergic reaction to any of the materials used in the study.
- •teeth with irreversible pulpitis or non-vital teeth.
- •fractured or cracked teeth. previously restored teeth.
- •teeth with deep sub-gingival cavity margins.
结局指标
主要结局
Fracture of restorative material and restoration retention
时间窗: four years
Clinical evaluation was performed one week after finishing and polishing (baseline), after 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 years using the World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Youness Saleh
lecturer
Mansoura University