Prospective Evaluation of Analgesic Outcomes of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Systemic Opioid Analgesia After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

This prospective observational clinical study investigates the comparative analgesic performance of three postoperative pain management strategies in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB), Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA), and systemic opioid analgesia. SPSIPB is a recently defined interfascial plane block that may provide multi-dermatomal analgesia of the upper thoracic region with a less invasive profile compared with traditional neuraxial techniques. TEA, although considered effective for thoracic surgery, is associated with technical difficulty and potential adverse effects such as hypotension, urinary retention, and motor block. Systemic opioid analgesia remains widely used but may be limited by nausea, sedation, and opioid-related complications.

In this study, adult patients scheduled for elective VATS under general anesthesia will be managed with one of the three analgesic strategies as part of routine clinical practice. No randomization or allocation will be performed by the investigators; analgesic technique selection will follow standard clinical decision-making by the treating anesthesiologist. Postoperative pain will be evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at predefined time points, including 0, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. Total opioid consumption within the first 24 hours will be quantified as the primary outcome, expressed in tramadol-equivalent dosing. Secondary outcomes include the requirement for rescue analgesics, postoperative nausea and vomiting, hemodynamic parameters, and the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score.

The study aims to provide comparative clinical evidence on the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of SPSIPB relative to TEA and systemic opioid analgesia in minimally invasive thoracic surgery. By identifying potential advantages or limitations of each technique, the findings may support optimization of multimodal analgesia protocols, improve postoperative comfort, and contribute to enhanced recovery strategies in VATS patients.