跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04079387
NCT04079387已完成不适用

Effect of Endotracheal Tube Plus STYLET Versus Endotracheal Tube Alone on Successful First-Pass Orotracheal Intubation Among Critically Ill Patients: the Randomised STYLETO Study Protocol"

University Hospital, Montpellier2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,040 人开始时间: 2019年10月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
1,040
试验地点
2
主要终点
Number of patients with successful first-pass orotracheal intubation

研究概览

简要总结

Patients admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICU) often require respiratory support. Orotracheal intubation is one of the most frequent procedures performed in ICU.When performed in emergency settings, intubation is a challenging issue as it may be associated with life-threatening complications in up to one third of cases

Using a preshaped endotracheal tube plus stylet may have potential advantages over endotracheal tube alone without stylet. The stylet is a rigid but malleable introducer which fits inside the endotracheal tube and allows for manipulation of the tube shape; usually into a hockey stick shape, to facilitate passage of the tube through the laryngeal inlet. The stylet can help to increase success of intubation in operating rooms

详细描述

Patients admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICU) often require respiratory support. Orotracheal intubation is one of the most frequent procedures performed in ICU. When performed in emergency settings, intubation is a challenging issue as it may be associated with life-threatening complications in up to one third of cases.Severe hypoxaemia occurring during intubation procedure can result in cardiac arrest,cerebral anoxia, and death.Difficult intubation is known to be associated with life-threatening complications both in operating room and in emergent conditions.ICU intubation conditions are worse than intubation conditions in operative rooms.A non-planned and urgent intubation procedure, severity of patient disease and ergonomic issues explain the morbidity associated with intubation in ICU.To prevent and limit the incidence of severe hypoxemia following intubation and its complications, several intubation algorithms have been developed ,and specific risk factors for difficult intubation in ICU have been identified.

In 2018, a large multicenter study reported first-attempt intubation success rates using direct laryngoscopy of 70% and videolaryngoscopy of 67%. In 2019, a multicentre randomized trial,assessing whether positive-pressure ventilation with a bag-mask device (bag-mask ventilation) during tracheal intubation of critically ill adults prevents hypoxemia, reported a first-attempt success rate of 81%. Other authors reported an overall first-attempt intubation success rate of 74%. The 20% to 40% first-attempt failure rates throughout studies highlight the opportunity to improve the safety and efficiency of this critical procedure. Using a preshaped endotracheal tube plus stylet may have potential advantages over endotracheal tube alone without stylet. The stylet is a rigid but malleable introducer which fits inside the endotracheal tube and allows for manipulation of the tube shape; usually into a hockey stick shape, to facilitate passage of the tube through the laryngeal inlet. The stylet can help to increase success of intubation in operating rooms.

However, some complications from intubating stylets have been reported including mucosal bleeding, perforation of the trachea or esophagus, and sore throat. In 2018, one study has assessed the effect of adding a stylet in case of difficult intubation in prehospital setting.However, in ICU, the systematic use of a stylet is still debated and recent recommendations do not recommend to use or not to use such devices for first-pass intubation. The device chosen for intubation may therefore be a confounding factor between the relation of stylet use and first-attempt success.The routine use of a stylet for first-pass intubation using laryngoscopes in ICU has never been assessed and benefit remains to be established.

The investigators hypothesis that adding stylet to endotracheal tube will increase the frequency of successful first-pass intubation compared with use endotracheal tube alone (i.e, without stylet) in ICU patients needing mechanical ventilation.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients must be present in the intensive care unit (ICU) and require mechanical ventilation through an orotracheal tube.
  • Adult (age ≥ 18 years)
  • Subjects must be covered by public health insurance
  • Written informed consent from the patient or proxy (if present) before inclusion or once possible when patient has been included in a context of emergency.

排除标准

  • Refusal of study participation or to pursue the study by the patient
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Absence of coverage by the French statutory healthcare insurance system
  • protected person
  • intubation in case of cardio circulatory arrest
  • Previous intubation during the same ICU stay and already included in the study

结局指标

主要结局

Number of patients with successful first-pass orotracheal intubation

时间窗: At intubation

the proportion of patients with successful first-pass orotracheal intubation

次要结局

  • Complications related to intubation(1 hour after intubation)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验