跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07412457
NCT07412457尚未招募不适用

Assessment of Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines in Patients With Dyslipidemia Using a Clinical Decision Support System

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 500 人开始时间: 2026年4月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
500
试验地点
1
主要终点
Medical error in the interpretation of cardiovascular risk

研究概览

简要总结

Objective: To validate the performance of the developed clinical decision support system (CDSS) for participants with lipid metabolism disorders based on a decision tree algorithm.

Materials and Methods: A clinical decision support system for participants with lipid profile abnormalities will be developed using the Orbeon open-source online form creation platform based on current clinical guidelines.

During the CDSS pilot implementation, the electronic medical records (EMRs) of 500 participants from the Institute of Personalized Cardiology of the Biomedical Science and Technology Park at Sechenov University will be analyzed.

Retrospective data on prescribed lipid-lowering therapy extracted from the EHR will be compared with the CDSS recommendations. The accuracy of the decisions will be assessed by three independent experts based on digitized clinical and laboratory patient profiles.

The primary endpoint of the study will be to determine the accuracy of the system.

Results: This study will result in the development (creation) and pilot application of the CDSS program in participants with dyslipidemia in real clinical practice.

Conclusion: The developed CDSS system for dyslipidemia will significantly reduce the time required for clinical decision-making and help avoid errors in the interpretation of patient data.

详细描述

This study was conducted as a retrospective observational study and was aimed at developing and applying a decision support system for physicians treating patients with lipid metabolism disorders based on a decision tree algorithm as well as to assess the degree of compliance with clinical guidelines for the management of patients with dyslipidemia in real clinical practice.

As part of the study, a retrospective analysis of the electronic medical records of adult participants will be conducted. Clinical data will be extracted from medical records, including demographic characteristics, laboratory lipid profile indicators (total cholesterol, low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides), kidney function indicators (creatinine level and estimated glomerular filtration rate), biochemical parameters, including alanine aminotransferase and creatine phosphokinase levels, as well as information on concomitant and past diseases.

The data of 500 participants will be structured and entered into an electronic form, which serves as the basis for a clinical decision support system implemented in the form of a decision tree algorithm. This system will be used exclusively for analytical purposes and make it possible to determine the indications for prescribing lipid-lowering therapy, its recommended intensity, and the need to adjust drug doses in accordance with current clinical guidelines.

The lipid-lowering therapy prescriptions actually administered by treating physicians and recorded in medical records will be compared with the recommendations generated by the clinical decision support system. An independent expert assessment will be conducted. An expert group consisting of three physicians will form their own recommendations for therapy based on each patients' clinical data, without having access to information about the actual prescriptions and the results of the algorithm, which ensured a blinded assessment of the endpoints.

Immediately after all patients have completed the questionnaire, two independent expert opinions will also be obtained for each patient. Then, by comparing the decisions of the attending physicians, the recommendations of the clinical decision support system, and the conclusions of the expert group, the degree of compliance of actual clinical practice with current clinical guidelines for the management of patients with dyslipidemia will be assessed.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Availability of the required amount of patient data for completion of the questionnaire-based system;
  • Age 18 years or older;
  • Signed informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Non-inclusion criteria:
  • Patients with insufficient data to complete the questionnaire;
  • Refusal to sign informed consent for participation in the study.

排除标准

  • Absence of a consensus opinion on the clinical case among two of the three experts.

研究组 & 干预措施

General cohort

500 patients will be structured and entered into an electronic form, which serves as the basis for a clinical decision support system implemented in the form of a decision tree algorithm. This system will be used exclusively for analytical purposes and make it possible to determine the indications for prescribing lipid-lowering therapy, its recommended intensity, and the need to adjust drug doses in accordance with current clinical guidelines

结局指标

主要结局

Medical error in the interpretation of cardiovascular risk

时间窗: At the end of the study: on average, 1.5 years

The number and type of incorrect interpretation of a patient's cardiovascular risk by a physician will be determined by three independent experts in comparison with the results of the medical decision support system

Medical error in prescribing lipid-lowering therapy

时间窗: At the end of the study: on average, 1.5 years

The number and type of incorrect prescribing lipid-lowering by a physician will be determined by three independent experts in comparison with the results of the medical decision support system

Errors frequency in the functioning of the developed medical decision support system compared to the decision of three independent experts

时间窗: At the end of the study: on average, 1.5 years

Errors frequency in the functioning of the developed medical decision support system will be determined when compared to the decision of three independent experts

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验