跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02112474
NCT02112474已完成不适用

The Pain Suppressive Effect of Low Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation Versus High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation

Jennifer Breel10 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2014年11月13日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
30
试验地点
10
主要终点
Visual Analog Pain Scores (VAS)

研究概览

简要总结

Electrical stimulation of the spinal cord (Spinal Cord Stimulation or SCS) for pain relief has been used for decades. It is used most commonly in patients with chronic neuropathic leg pain, after spinal surgery. Conventional neurostimulation is applied in frequencies of 30 to 60 Hertz (Hz) and perceptible paraesthesias are felt. Stimulation using higher frequencies with sub perception paraesthesias has recently challenged the conventional form of neurostimulation.The high frequency stimulation appears to show better pain relief for both back and limb pain in comparison to low frequency SCS, and may also to be effective in some subjects who did not respond to low frequency SCS.

详细描述

Rationale:

Electrical stimulation of the dorsal columns of the spinal cord (Spinal Cord Stimulation or SCS) for pain relief has been used in humans for several decades. The most common indication for SCS is the treatment of refractory neuropathic leg pain, particularly when these symptoms persist after an anatomically successful operation (Failed Back Surgery Syndrome or FBSS).

Low frequency - conventional - SCS (LF-SCS) is applied in frequencies ranging from 30 to 60 Hertz (Hz) and the subject feels paraesthesias in the painful area, which is considered the ideal situation. Recently, LF-SCS has been challenged by the development of stimulation modes at higher frequencies which provide pain relief at sub-perception threshold, i.e. without paraesthesias. A recent case series reported that High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation (HF-SCS) appears to show better pain relief for both back and limb pain in comparison to LF-SCS, and also to be effective in some subjects who did not respond to LF-SCS.

Objective:

The primary objective of this trial is to compare pain suppression in two groups of subjects with chronic unilateral limb pain as a result of FBSS .

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Male/female, 18 years to 70 years
  • Chronic, persistent, refractory, unilateral neuropathic limb pain, as a result of spinal surgery
  • Failed conservative treatments for chronic pain including but not limited to pharmacological therapy, physical therapy and minimally interventional pain procedures for chronic pain
  • Pain radiating in the leg, following segments L4 and/or L5 and/or S1 for at least 6 months
  • Minimum baseline pain intensity as assessed by VAS of ≥ 50mm on 100mm scale in the primary pain area
  • Subject is able and willing to provide informed consent
  • Subject is able and willing to comply with the protocol and follow-up schedule
  • Subject has been included for implantation according to standard criteria from the Dutch Neuromodulation Society

排除标准

  • Back pain component of more than 20% or VAS > 40mm on 100mm scale
  • Bilateral limb pain
  • Subjects with a previous SCS implantation.
  • Changes in pain medication in the 2 months preceding the trial period;
  • Expected inability of subjects to correctly operate the neurostimulation system
  • Presence of any other clinically significant or disabling chronic pain condition -eg. hip arthrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, etc.
  • History of coagulation disorders, lupus erythematosus, diabetes mellitus, or morbus Bechterew
  • Symptoms or proof of any malignant disease
  • Current use of medicines affecting coagulation which cannot be temporarily stopped
  • Evidence of an active disruptive psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact the perception of pain, compliance to intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as determined by the investigator
  • Life expectancy of less than 1 year
  • Existing or planned pregnancy in the trial period
  • BMI >20 and <35 - a minimum and maximum BMI limit are imposed due to the technical difficulties and risk of complications in underweight or morbidly obese subjects.

结局指标

主要结局

Visual Analog Pain Scores (VAS)

时间窗: 24 days

0mm to 10mm line scale, where higher score is better, measured 4 times a day at 09:00, 15:00, 21:00 and a nightscore measured first thing in the morning

次要结局

  • Short Form-36(1 month, 12 months)
  • Visual Analog Pain scores (VAS)(12 months)
  • EuroQoL 5Dimensions-3Levels(1 month, 12 months)
  • Sleep questionnaire(1 month, 12 months)
  • (Serious) Adverse Events(12 months)
  • GPES(1 month, 12 months)
  • Employment status(12 months)

研究者

发起方
Jennifer Breel
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Jennifer Breel

Study Investigator

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

研究点 (10)

Loading locations...

相似试验