跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05710627
NCT05710627招募中不适用

Evaluation of Percutaneous Tenotomy of the Gluteus Medius and Iliotibial Band for Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS): A Randomized Clinical Trial

Montefiore Medical Center2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 150 人开始时间: 2025年3月11日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
150
试验地点
2
主要终点
Pain Level

研究概览

简要总结

The objective of this study is to evaluate how an ultrasound-guided percutaneous procedure, TENEX, can help people with chronic hip pain resulting from a condition called Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS) and to characterize the efficacy of percutaneous tenotomy (PUT) using TENEX®, a device used for the treatment of various tendinopathies. In this study an ultrasound (US) is performed to guide the partial release of gluteus medius and minimus and Iliotibial band tendons in patients diagnosed with refractory Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS) vs control. The investigator team hypothesizes that the new TENEX can improve the pain level for individuals with GTPS to help those individuals perform their activities of daily living (ADLs), e.g., walking, standing, and side-lying, as well as demonstrate less medication utilization. The study predicts that this percutaneous outpatient procedure can decrease pain, increase mobility, and decrease medication utilization.

The study team hypothesizes that PUT can improve the pain level and function for individuals suffering with GTPS. The study will assess walking, standing, and side-lying tolerance, as well as medication utilization. The investigator team predicts that this percutaneous outpatient procedure can decrease pain and medication utilization while increasing mobility.

详细描述

Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is one of the most common causes of lateral hip pain in adults. GTPS is repetitive overload tendinopathy of the gluteus medius (GMed) and Iliotibial band (ITB), which play a primary role in hip abduction and pelvic stabilization in walking, stair climbing, running and standing on one leg. It is thought that the core pathology is greater trochanteric bursitis (TB) with or without coexisting gluteal tendinopathy. Some common etiologies include prolonged excessive pressure to the area, injury to the side of the hip, and repetitive movements; however, local steroid injections to the greater TB are not often successful over the long-term. The best estimates of prevalence are from a large, community-based study with over 3000 adults aged 50 to 70 years, in which unilateral GTPS was present in 15 percent of women and 6.6 percent of men. Patients who have not improved after at least 12 months of conservative medical management (CMM), including physical therapy, oral medications, or a local steroid injection have no other conservative treatment recourse. Open surgery for GMed or ITB tears is not recommended unless a tear is diagnosed on MRI. Based on a published study, a 60% improvement was shown in pain with the performance of TENEX of the GMed.

The purpose of this project is to study the outcome of GMed and ITB PUT on CMM refractory GTPS. We want to quantify and show the scales of the pain in pre-operative and post-treatment cases. We also want to see how effective the surgery is in specific terms of pain levels because GTPS is a pain syndrome and reduction in pain level is the most important clinical factor.

Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) is one of the main outcomes that medical research is validated with and through this study we want to show the most important outcome of GTPS i.e., pain level (PROM for GTPS). Previous studies which focused on surgical outcomes have been mostly single-center trials.

Pain and mobility impact patients' Quality of Life (QoL) and medical cost burden due to unemployment, psychosocial well-being, and functional dependence. The standard of care offered to address the pain and mobility needs of those with GTPS is to provide CMM, followed by open or arthroscopic surgery if surgery is indicated. However, there is a treatment gap for those patients who have failed CMM and are not surgical candidates. The authors submit that TENEX of the GMed and ITB may address this gap. The results from this research may have broad impacts on the treatment algorithm for patients with GTPS.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
30 Years 至 90 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Aged 18-90
  • People with GTPS of all different levels and etiologies confirmed with MRI or CT scan
  • Ability to give informed consent forms independently
  • Failed conservative medical treatment for at least 6 months

排除标准

  • Significant mobility restrictions; people using wheelchairs
  • Pregnancy
  • Previous surgery to the GMed or ITB

研究组 & 干预措施

Control

No Intervention

Standard of care

Treatment

Experimental

TENEX device will be used

干预措施: TENEX (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Pain Level

时间窗: Baseline (before treatment), 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years

The difference in pain levels in patients before and after the procedure. Pain levels (NRS scale) recorded in the pre-operative visit will be compared to the pain levels at follow-up (FU) visits. The Numeric rating scale (NRS) is a pain screening tool used to assess pain severity using a 0-10 scale, with 0 meaning no pain and 10 meaning the worst pain imaginable. Pain level scores will be summarized by study arm. Achievement of 50% reduction in pain level from baseline at 6 months post treatment will be considered successful.

次要结局

  • Quality of Life using the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L)(Baseline (before treatment), 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验