跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01182831
NCT01182831Unknown1 期

A Randomized Trial Comparing Fluoroscopy Guided Percutaneous Technique Versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Technique of Celiac Plexus Neurolysis for Treatment of Pain in Carcinoma Pancreas

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2010年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
1 期
发起方
入组人数
100
试验地点
2
主要终点
immediate pain relief

研究概览

简要总结

Coeliac plexus neurolysis (CPN) is a management option for pain control in carcinoma pancreas.CPN is conventionally performed by percutaneous technique with fluoroscopic guidance. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is increasingly used for CPN as it offers a better visualization of the plexus. There are limited data comparing the two modalities.The patients are on follow-up for 6 months post neurolysis.

详细描述

Carcinoma pancreas patients with abdominal pain requiring daily analgesics for more than 4 weeks were included.we are randomising about 100 patients into two groups to undergo either of the two procedures, i.e. celiac plexus neurolysis by percutaneous technique or by endoscopic ultrasound guided technique.The pain scores have been recorded by visual analogue scale for an average follow-up of 6 months.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • all patients with carcinoma pancreas

排除标准

  • patients below 18 years of age and who have not given consent

结局指标

主要结局

immediate pain relief

时间窗: day of block to six months of follow-up

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
申办方类型
Other

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验