Establishing Video Decision Aids for Geriatric Patients With Frailty to Promote Advance Care Planning: Comprehensibility, Usability, Feasibility
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- Enrolling By Invitation
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- comprehensibility
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of this observational study aimed to develop and assess a video decision aid for advance care planning in geriatric patients with frailty. The main question it aims to answer is:
The video decision aid comprehensibility, usability, feasibility? The video includes an introduction to geriatric frailty (3 minutes) and advance care planning (5 minutes). Advance care planning includes three levels of medical care: life-prolonging care, limited care, and comfort care.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Case Only
- 时间视角
- Cross Sectional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Phase 1 - Patients
- •Aged 65 or older.
- •Have not completed an advance directive (AD) document.
- •Able to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese.
- •Have adequate vision and hearing to watch a video in Mandarin or Taiwanese on a tablet.
- •Willing to participate in the study after explanation.
- •Phase 1 - Family Members
- •Aged 18 or older.
- •Have not completed an advance directive (AD) document.
- •Able to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese.
- •Have adequate vision and hearing to watch a video in Mandarin or Taiwanese on a tablet.
- •Willing to participate in the study after explanation.
- •Phase 1 - Healthcare Providers
- •Have not completed an advance directive (AD) document.
- •Able to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese.
- •Willing to participate in the study after explanation.
- •Phase 2 - Patients
- •Aged 65 or older.
- •Have participated in shared decision-making (SDM) using decision aid tools.
- •Have experience in advance care planning (ACP) consultation or have completed related written advance directive documents.
- •Able to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese.
- •Have adequate vision and hearing to watch a video in Mandarin or Taiwanese on a tablet.
- •Willing to participate in the study after explanation.
- •Phase 2 - Healthcare Providers
- •Have professional knowledge and practical experience in advance care planning (ACP).
- •Have experience caring for frail elderly populations.
- •Able to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese.
- •Willing to participate in the study after explanation.
排除标准
- •1.Cognitive impairment, unable to communicate clearly.
结局指标
主要结局
comprehensibility
时间窗: Watching a 10-minute video and completing questionnaire takes approximately 5-10 minutes.
Comprehensibility was measured using a knowledge questionnaire and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V).The knowledge questionnaire consists of 7 questions, each with 10 correct answer choices, scored at 10 points per correct choice, for a total of 100 points. Higher scores indicate greater accuracy in knowledge and better comprehension. The PEMAT-A/V evaluates comprehension through 13 items and feasibility through 4 items. Responses are scored as Agree = 1 point, Disagree = 0 points, and Not Applicable (N/A) excluded from the total score calculation. The final score is calculated as Total Points/Total Possible Points x 100. Higher scores indicate that the material is easier to comprehend or more feasibility. Measurement timing: elder patients and their family members will complete the knowledge questionnaire before viewing the video. They will also complete the PEMAT A/V within one hour after viewing the materials.
usability
时间窗: Watching a 10-minute video and completing questionnaire takes approximately 5-10 minute
Usability was evaluated through a feedback questionnaire. The feedback questionnaire consists of 6 items. Except for the final open-ended question, the remaining items are scored using a 4-point Likert scale (0-3). Lower scores indicate higher usability. Measurement timing: elder patients and their family members will complete the feedback questionnaire within one hour after viewing the materials.
feasibility
时间窗: Watching a 10-minute video and completing questionnaire takes approximately 5-10 minute
Feasibility were evaluated through the PEMAT-A/V. The PEMAT-A/V evaluates comprehension through 13 items and feasibility through 4 items. Responses are scored as Agree = 1 point, Disagree = 0 points, and Not Applicable (N/A) excluded from the total score calculation. The final score is calculated as Total Points/Total Possible Points x 100. Higher scores indicate that the material is easier to comprehend or more feasibility. Measurement timing: elder patients and Healthcare professionals (Have experience in advance care planning) will complete the PEMAT A/V within one hour after viewing the materials.
次要结局
未报告次要终点