跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03187574
NCT03187574已完成不适用

A Prospective Comparison of Two Vaginal Mesh Kits in the Management of Anterior and Apical Vaginal Prolapse: Long Term-results for Apical Fixation and Quality of Life

Hospices Civils de Lyon0 个研究点目标入组 126 人开始时间: 2009年5月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
126
主要终点
comparison of anatomic correction rates in the vaginal apex at 1 year between two mesh kits

研究概览

简要总结

Our study is a non-randomized prospective study compared two groups matched for anterior/apical POP-Q grade: 84 received Elevate Ant™ single-incision mesh (group A) and 42 Perigee™ transvaginal mesh (group B). The study hypothesis was that the Elevate Ant™ mesh would provide better apical correction than the Perigee™ mesh. One- and 2-year follow-up comprised anatomic assessment (POP-Q) and QoL (PFDI-20, PFIQ-7, PISQ-12). Success was defined as 2-year POP-Q ≤1. Secondary endpoints were function and complications.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • symptomatic patient presenting with POP-Q grade ≥3 anterior or apical prolapse

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

comparison of anatomic correction rates in the vaginal apex at 1 year between two mesh kits

时间窗: 1 year post-surgery

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验