Assessing Continuous Glucose Monitor Use in Underserved Primary Care Patients

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has demonstrated improved outcomes in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes populations in comparison to traditional methods; however, these devices have not been well studied in underserved adult patients (e.g., low-income, uninsured) who may face additional barriers to monitoring. Furthermore, there is limited data exploring long-term (3- to 6- month) health care team-based management of these devices in the primary care setting. This study will evaluate the perceived and experienced benefits and barriers of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and traditional glucometer use and identify diabetes related outcomes associated with CGM use relative to usual care with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in an underserved population.

Eligible adult (>=19 years of age) patients at participating clinics with type 2 diabetes, A1c >=9%, and concomitant insulin therapy and/or using two or more diabetes medications will be randomly enrolled to one of two groups: Freestyle Libre 2 CGM or traditional glucometer. Pre- and post-surveys will be used to evaluate perceived and experienced benefits and barriers to CGM use and diabetes-related outcomes will be compared between the groups using face-to-face, telephonic, and/or digital avenues. The latter aim will replicate current processes of team-based diabetes care which is blood glucose management from a pharmacist under collaborative practice with the primary care physician. Follow-up will also replicate these clinic processes throughout the 6-month period, including telephone calls and monthly in-clinic visits.